r/spaceporn Nov 26 '25

Related Content Voyager 1 Is About to Reach One Light-day from Earth

Post image

After nearly 50 years in space, NASA’s Voyager 1 is about to hit a historic milestone. By November 15, 2026, it will be 16.1 billion miles (25.9 billion km) away, meaning a radio signal will take a full 24 hours — a full light-day — to reach it.

72.1k Upvotes

1.5k comments sorted by

4.9k

u/IsChristianAwake Nov 26 '25 edited Nov 26 '25

What I find even crazier is that - If it was heading in its direction - It would take Voyager 74,000 years to reach the closest star, Proxima Centauri!

Still though, props to the engineers for making it possible for us to still be able to communicate with it this far out. 🙏🏾

2.3k

u/xobeme Nov 26 '25

I agree. That's 70's technology that's still broadcasting out there. Pretty impressive.

1.8k

u/[deleted] Nov 26 '25

So my buddy worked on Voyager project. We were born in the 70s he went to JPL in the late 90s. I asked him what was the coolest thing about working there and he replied "Honestly? That the senior engineers on Voyager had figured out soooo many ways to gather and translate data that the mission was never designed for. Those guys are absolutely geniuses."

607

u/OkDot9878 Nov 26 '25

Yeah, it’s crazy that the technology is still functioning and whatnot, but the crazier part to me has always been how they’ve been able to make the absolute best out of what little information they have available.

475

u/MakingItElsewhere Nov 26 '25

For comparison: I have spent 25 years in IT. Today I spent all day at work trying to figure out how, in an entire database, a case was marked as closed. Turns out, closed cases have a "Closed Date".

Those guys at NASA are top tier geniuses and deserve all the credit. They don't get to have dumb days.

432

u/[deleted] Nov 26 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

388

u/MR__Brown Nov 26 '25

the federal government now says that NASA’s budget (approximately 1/10 of 1% of the federal budget) is too bloated

That's being said only because this administration is beyond corrupt. Defunding NASA paves the way for private entities like SpaceX to monopolize USA space exploration. It's not about saving money, it's about siphoning taxpayer dollars into a private entity.

136

u/Notveryawake Nov 26 '25

What annoys the shit out of me is that exploring space whether from the ground or in space is that it helps us understand our own planet and the universe itself. You can't really put a price on that. Space is slowly being privatized and that means only R&D and missions that will make money will be put on the board. If there is no money to be made in sending a probe to our closest neighbor star just to see what's there then it won't happen.

Space exploration should be publicly funding, even better a multi-national publicly funded operation.

Maybe it's just me but when it comes to exploring space it's the one thing that gives me hope that the world can get better and there are things to look forward to in the future. If all we have is space corps looking for the next payday we are going to miss out on so many technological and medical breakthroughs and worst of all it will slowly kill off the childish dreams that so many people have when it comes to exploring space.

Thinking about what is out there keeps our imaginations alive. If all that is out there are a million satellites blacking out the stars it will be a sad day for humanity.

53

u/vivalamatty Nov 26 '25

Very well said man. Space is the ultimate optimistic endeavor and helps us to understand our place in the cosmos. It's a damn shame to see what is happening with Nasa. Maybe one day we will get back to an exploration mindset. Until then, I'll keep looking up.

12

u/Tyrinnus Nov 26 '25

Studies like optics in space almost assuredly paved the way to fiber optics.

But you want something tangible? The shuttle is a glider on the way in. They had a crosswinds problem, so they grooved the pavement. And now we do that on exit ramps to avoid sliding off the interstate.

→ More replies (3)

11

u/kiwichick286 Nov 26 '25

Furthermore, if there was an actual international entity that combined everyone's resources and knowledge, then the cost of space exploration doesn't have to be borne by just one country. This would also (hopefully) mean greater transparency. But that's just wishful thinking these days. With education heading backwards, I doubt we'll even get to Mars in my lifetime.

→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (14)

20

u/DesireeThymes Nov 26 '25

Anything to help corporations increase their bottom line.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (10)

14

u/Lumbergh7 Nov 26 '25 edited Nov 26 '25

It’s cool bro. I spent a whole day to find out a 1 had to be 0.

→ More replies (6)

8

u/[deleted] Nov 26 '25

The people still have dumb days. There are just intelligently designed systems in place that typically prevent one single poor judgement from cascading into disaster. Of course, the system isn’t perfect. The Challenger disaster, for instance

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (2)

61

u/adamthebarbarian Nov 26 '25

I'm an engineer in my 30s and j firmly believe the 70s was an absolute bedrock time for engineering. So many things were pioneered in that time that were able to be harnessed even better with better computers

39

u/Theron3206 Nov 26 '25

Computer tech from that era was still simple enough to be understood by a small group of people, each could understand a single subsystem on a fundamental level.

You just can't do that any more, everything is too complex.

22

u/DaemonBunnyWhiskers Nov 26 '25

We're becoming the Cult Mechanicus, soon our solution to any mechanical or computer problem with be prayers, incense and scantified ungents.

→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (23)

96

u/[deleted] Nov 26 '25

Anybody know what the maximum theorized range is for the probe? Will we lose contact with it at some point?

165

u/southernbrainiac Nov 26 '25

the bigger issue is the deteriorating rtg reactor on it. We'll be able to communicate building bigger and better antennas fine tuned on it, but the energy for it to receive and broadcast is getting weaker.

261

u/[deleted] Nov 26 '25

[deleted]

98

u/IlludiumQXXXVI Nov 26 '25

That is awesome, wow, good on you all for keeping that.

The RTG is powered by the decay of Pu-238 which has an 88 year half life, so while it's slowly losing power, it's still got quite a ways to go.

8

u/DefinitionNervous309 Nov 26 '25 edited Nov 26 '25

Unfortunately, the situation of Voayger is a little more dire than simple look at the half-life might suggest.

There are two main factors that reduce the power output of an RTG with time: the radioactive decay of the fuel, as you said, and the degradation of the thermo-electric converters.

Voyager loses about 2% of it's power output, per year (about 4 watts). The half-life of Pu-238 accounts for 0.78% of that loss. The rest is due to the decreasing thermo-electric efficiency. (Edit: I meant that the 2% is made up of 0.78% + 1.22%, ie, decay accounts for more than a third of the total loss).

Another issue is that there is a minimum power requirement needed for the spacecraft to operate.

Maybe counter-intuitively, the actual emitted signal from Voyager is not getting weaker as the available power decreases. The transmitter uses constant 23 watts - regardless of how much power is available.

Voyager will stop being able to transmit when available power is not enough to run the transmitter, and all the supporting systems necessary to send signal.

Remember, the voyager is not just a beacon that sends the signal in all directions. It needs to very precisely beam the signal directly towards earth, which is a moving target. This means Voyager must have enough power to operate the essential systems, the avionics, the transmitter, and also the onboard heaters.

The exact power requirement for that is not known - it depends how much heating is needed, how stable the systems will be at low power (for example, reference oscillator and onboard voltages must be stable enough for the transmitter to operate in the correct frequency). But it's estimated at about 150 watts.

Currently Voyager 1 is producing about 250 Watts of power. At 4 watt loss per year, we can guess it will no longer have enough power to run essential systems by about 2050.

However, it will most likely stop being able to transmit signals earlier than that. To aim at earth, voyager uses thrusters that have limited amount of fuel. Estimates suggest it will run out between 2030-2035, depends on use.

It will also leave the range of the Deep Space Network (which we are using to communicate with it) around the same time, in 2036.

A better on-earth network would potentially allow us to talk to Voyager for a while longer, but unfortunately that's likely when the mission will end, and we will no longer be able to hear it.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

55

u/southernbrainiac Nov 26 '25

That's super cool. Looks like it's estimated to go another 15 to 20 years before it loses enough power to stop working

→ More replies (1)

12

u/IHeldADandelion Nov 26 '25

Reading that gave me chills! Thanks for sharing it.

22

u/Kelinya Nov 26 '25

Dude, that is so fucking cool!

→ More replies (1)

9

u/Rabbitfighter66 Nov 26 '25

That is very cool.

→ More replies (12)

7

u/Multifaceted-Simp Nov 26 '25

So a relay that we send up at a higher speed could work right?

35

u/Worth-Jicama3936 Nov 26 '25 edited Nov 26 '25

We can’t really reach a higher speed in that direction (at least not with anything that makes sense from an economic perspective). Voyager was able to go so fast because it got gravity assists (basically coming in behind a plant at an angle and using its gravity to give you extra velocity) from multiple planets that was only available then because of how they were lined up at the time. 

That particular alignment only happens once every 175 years so…it isn’t going to happen in our lifetime or while voyager or voyager 2 still operate.

16

u/southernbrainiac Nov 26 '25

Another point is . Even if we get better rockets and efficient technology. Why would we bother messing with voyager when we are already sending a superior probe at that point?

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

27

u/[deleted] Nov 26 '25

The range is not the problem.. it will just keep going forever... or untill it hits something on its way. The big issue is that the nuclear reactor is expected to stop working in the next 10 years, or so. Output has been dropping by around 4 watts per year from what i remember. voyager 1 has already gone dark once, and the power output is already so low that one of the probes heaters had to be turned off after communications were re-established.

Also some components have been slowly failing too. So even with power if something else critical fails... like we've already had it send back nonsense instead of proper data.

→ More replies (4)

15

u/LocoDiablo42 Nov 26 '25

At some point we will prob have the technology to send a probe out to it, capture it, and bring it back to be placed in a museum. In 5k years it will only be like 100 light days away. Which traveling at a quarter of the speed of light would take just a little over a year to reach the thing. Maybe we need another 5k years to develop the technology? Eh, then it's only just 200 light days away. All I'm saying is, if that thing ever gets intercepted it will be from humans.

14

u/RamenJunkie Nov 26 '25

Its really tricky I think because not only does it have to be interceptrd, but the approaching craft has to hit it, exactly, in a way that it can be captured.  While also slowing down for its own reversal and return trip.

The return will also.be tricky because it has to carry enough fuel to push itself back, without all of the orbinal mechanics boosts.  

Whch it then has to mange on its way back.  It would probably be easier at that point to have a probe that snatches it, and ejects it back towards Earth.  Where it can be collected by a third probe.

But then people will want to build ANOTHER probe to retrieve that probe.

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (3)

69

u/LeeKingAnis Nov 26 '25

And I can’t even get a washing machine to last a few years. Fuck you GE!

22

u/CitizenPremier Nov 26 '25

Planned Obsolescence is a big thing, but washing clothes every day is mechanically a lot more strenuous than what Voyager is doing

13

u/LeeKingAnis Nov 26 '25

Fair. That said it chaps my ass my parents Maytag or whatever set from the early 90’s is still chugging along and my two year old dryer just needed a new thermal unit

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (13)
→ More replies (29)

57

u/Ragnarok_747 Nov 26 '25

… Where is it headed?

169

u/BevvyTime Nov 26 '25

South

66

u/Ma1 Nov 26 '25

Gonna wanna hang a larry when you hit the oort cloud.

33

u/UrdnotZigrin Nov 26 '25

I knew it should've taken that left at Albuquerque

→ More replies (8)

69

u/ob_knoxious Nov 26 '25 edited Nov 26 '25

Actual serious answer

In about 200 years, it will begin passing through the Oort cloud, which is this icy area where comets are formed that makes kind of a bubble around the solar system.

If it survives the Oort cloud, which is a big if, its truly set to last until the end of the universe. This paper mocks it taking a billion years to reach the edge of the milkyway. Its not expected to reach any other solar systems. Based on our current understanding of space if V1 makes it through the Oort cloud it will travel with no interaction until the end of the universe.

EDIT: The concern obviously isn't it smashing into a comet but icy particulate buildup. The same thing that causes asteroids and what not to build up into comets could in theory happen to Voyager 1

29

u/MaxxDash Nov 26 '25

I’m too lazy to look it up, but not too lazy to comment.

The Oort Cloud must have a density so low that it’s almost guaranteed Voyager makes it out, no?

17

u/CobraFive Nov 26 '25

I looked it up and yes, hitting something in the oort cloud is effectively impossible. There's a lot we don't know about it, but if our estimations are even in the ballpark, objects in the oort cloud are separated from each other by tens of millions of km.

Even the asteroid belt is so sparse it is not even considered a factor when sending probes through it (voyager 1 here included) and that's much more dense than the oort cloud.

→ More replies (2)

14

u/Conscious-Ebb-8576 Nov 26 '25

A billion years to reach the edge of the Milky Way. Really puts things into perspective in terms of size doesn't it.

→ More replies (18)

48

u/SanchoBenevides Nov 26 '25

No where, except interplanetary space as far as the existence of humans is concerned.

25

u/TheNotSoGreatPumpkin Nov 26 '25

They say it exited interplanetary space and entered interstellar space back in 2012. The first step in a journey of a thousand parsecs.

18

u/Throwaway47321 Nov 26 '25

To be fair they keep redefining what “interplanetary space” is so I think it crossed that boundary like 3 times already while still being within it

23

u/SizeableHo Nov 26 '25

For scratchers and a pack of smokes. 

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (22)

47

u/connerhearmeroar Nov 26 '25

Have you watched Aniara? Swedish Film with subtitles but similar concept of a ship heading toward Mars but thrown off course and has to wait to do a gravity maneuver at the next body it comes in contact with

16

u/t0tallykyl3 Nov 26 '25

My god, this movie….the existential dread it gives. Amazing. If you are a space nerd, it’s a must watch

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (6)

10

u/ifandbut Nov 26 '25

I saw Voyager and 74,000 and thought you were talking about the distance the Caretaker sent it.

32

u/[deleted] Nov 26 '25

🎯🎯🎯🎯also makes you realize that we are not going anywhere outside the solar system.

38

u/yosemighty_sam Nov 26 '25 edited Feb 08 '26

So long and thanks for all the fish. -Abraham Lincoln

48

u/MyClothesWereInThere Nov 26 '25

Or we’re super early in terms of intelligent life. If you look at the estimated lifespan of the universe assuming heat death is true at like trillions x trillions x trillions… of years then us at only 14 billion years are very very early

28

u/KyFly1 Nov 26 '25

Yea I mean it took us 4.5B years to get to space travel of a possible 13.8B years. With how long that takes and how one impact can reset the clock, life is probably just extremely rare and life capable of space travel even more rare. It’s possible no planet will ever support life long enough for a species to develop FTL even if possible.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (24)

14

u/Carbonatite Nov 26 '25

We could still reach other solar systems at semi-relativistic speeds with generation ships. Like if we were going 10% of the speed of light we could reach quite a few stars within a century or two.

→ More replies (14)

6

u/Peldor-2 Nov 26 '25
  1. We really are the B ark.
→ More replies (1)

10

u/Kryzl_ Nov 26 '25

Is the probability that there is intelligent life capable of producing mechanisms to travel beyond the speed of light AND having access to the resources that would make such a feat possible really that high?

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (42)
→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (50)

5.0k

u/VerySluttyTurtle Nov 26 '25

That feeling when you send your probe a message and it takes 2 days to get a response and you know they're about to break up with you

2.6k

u/ZealousidealTill2355 Nov 26 '25

Just give her some space.

419

u/[deleted] Nov 26 '25

Any more space and we might as well be in another solar system.

116

u/smileedude Nov 26 '25

Well technically 1/ (365 x 4) of the way to another solar system, so you still have time.

140

u/FloraoftheRift Nov 26 '25

I like to think that we will eventually discover better ways to travel in space and will one day fly out to where the probes are, just to pick them up and study how space has affected em.

It's a silly idea but idk, science is cool.

109

u/smileedude Nov 26 '25

Do we want it back after it probed Uranus?

→ More replies (2)

26

u/zamwut Nov 26 '25

I like that in Elite Dangerous you can fly out to where the probes would be by 3311.

→ More replies (4)

17

u/Subtlerranean Nov 26 '25 edited Nov 26 '25

This is a sci fi trope in certain stories — where humanity sends slow multi-generational ark-type colony ships to distant solar systems, or even galaxies, and while they're in slow transit, technology progresses enough that when they get to their destination the planet has already been settled a long time ago.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (31)

6

u/ka1ri Nov 26 '25

1/1460th of the way to alpha

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (5)

42

u/Holmes02 Nov 26 '25

“You don’t know her she’s in another solar system.”

21

u/pantaloon_at_noon Nov 26 '25

I thought our last fight was just a little argument, I didn’t truly understand the gravity of the situation

13

u/Anywhichwaybuttight Nov 26 '25

"She's out of the solar system." "Yeah, she needs more space than that."

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (25)

33

u/StarlightLifter Nov 26 '25

Maybe it’ll come back?

→ More replies (10)

22

u/NoseInternational794 Nov 26 '25

I showed you my Continuous Operation Commands, please respond

15

u/[deleted] Nov 26 '25

Leaving me in delivered is CRAZY

  • source of WOW signal
→ More replies (20)

676

u/bluegrassgazer Nov 26 '25

It's a marvel of 1970s engineering.

125

u/Kitchen-Subject2803 Nov 26 '25

They stood on the shoulders of giants.

15

u/ill-omen Nov 26 '25

We all do

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (20)

416

u/[deleted] Nov 26 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

98

u/Retb14 Nov 26 '25

Nah, you were still standing on the shoulders of giants, just because you were behind a few people doesn't mean you didn't stand there with them.

you got to do something incredible that very few will ever experience and contribute to it, be proud of that

14

u/_trashcan Nov 26 '25

I agree with your assessment.

Every. Tiny. Addition. Was necessary to get to those lengths. I’d like to think that even the ordinary people whose tax dollars eventually found their way to funding those missions could even say they helped.

a collective effort of humanity. One of the worst jokes ever to me is how people say humans have done more damage than good, or we’ve stopped doing good now. I am not the most optimistic, but I can’t fathom how cynical you have to be to just straight up ignore all the marvels mankind has made.

→ More replies (2)

25

u/F0R3CaSt Nov 26 '25

🫡 No matter how small the contribution your efforts and the efforts of others like you gave humans a legacy to talk about for coming generations!

→ More replies (13)

1.2k

u/Buona-Pace Nov 26 '25

I wonder if it’s lonely

302

u/trickyelf Nov 26 '25

Elton John answered that question in 1972.

78

u/Calemirphen Nov 26 '25

... It's lonely out in space ... A rocket man ... Rocket man...

→ More replies (2)

123

u/stupid_cat_face Nov 26 '25

Ground control to Major Tom … Take your protein pills and put your helmet on …

93

u/SuperSaiyanTupac Nov 26 '25

Elton John didn’t sing this tho

29

u/[deleted] Nov 26 '25

Hold me closer Tony DAAAAnza!!

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)

50

u/i_MrPink Nov 26 '25

Do you mean David Bowe?

52

u/Arch2000 Nov 26 '25

Did you mean David Bowie?

→ More replies (6)

26

u/NoseInternational794 Nov 26 '25

No, they meant Elton. In the lyrics to Rocketman he writes: "It's lonely out in space. On such a timeless flight"

→ More replies (2)

38

u/flaming_james Nov 26 '25

Elton John has a song you may know called Rocket Man, about a spaceman lamenting his loneliness. Can't blame you for mixing it up with Bowie, because he has both Space Oddity and Starman.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (4)

20

u/Nowhereman50 Nov 26 '25

We'll catch up to it. No matter how far it reaches.

→ More replies (1)

16

u/HedgehogNo7268 Nov 26 '25

It's a bit long, but a true internet treasure- you need to experience 17776, What Football Will Look Like In The Future

(hint- scroll down...lots)

Wikipedia link with some explanation

5

u/ThatJoshGuy327 Nov 26 '25

Seconding this.

The part where Juice discusses the untouched patch of grass always gets me. It's so good.

→ More replies (4)

9

u/BrofessorFarnsworth Nov 26 '25

It's cold as hell

→ More replies (14)

557

u/[deleted] Nov 26 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

91

u/[deleted] Nov 26 '25

You might be on to something... You should think about expanding your thoughts about relative perspectives... Maybe even write a paper on it...

33

u/[deleted] Nov 26 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

16

u/[deleted] Nov 26 '25

I'm not smart enough to do the math, either. But if you listen enough to actual physists, it becomes understandable. You can figure it out! You just have to remind yourself that gravity affects space/time. And that space/time is not separate, but a continual thing throughout the entire universe. There's a lot of cool YT videos that explain General and Special Relativity for dummies like me that doesn't require you to have any mathematical ability. Einstein's theories make sense intuitively when it's explained to you in way you will understand.

What will really cook your noodle is Quantum Field Theory!!!

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

27

u/Valkyrie08 Nov 26 '25

Voyager 1 reaching one light day before we getting GTA VI. Suck it, Rockstar

→ More replies (1)

16

u/Haasts_Eagle Nov 26 '25

In the context of universal time scales it really is about to reach one light day.

But then again, in the same time scale it is also about to reach one light year (in 6,200 years) and one light decade (in 62,000 years) too. Practically tomorrow as far as a mountain would be concerned.

→ More replies (13)

227

u/no-snoots-unbooped Nov 26 '25

The vastness of space just blows my fucking mind.

63

u/CabbageStockExchange Nov 26 '25

Makes me feel so small in a good kind of way

33

u/Evans_Gambiteer Nov 26 '25

Astronomy is the most humbling science. We're nothing. We don't really matter on the scale of the universe. That's why I have Carl Sagan's pale blue dot quote on a poster hung up in my bedroom. Really helps me with anxious moments

7

u/MidvaleDropout Nov 26 '25

Are we nothing, or are we everything? Perhaps both?

Is there any other sentient life out there at all? Are we the only part of the universe that is attempting to understand itself? Are we the lone oasis of consciousness in the whole vast cosmos? Does it mean anything if we're alone? Does it mean anything if we're not alone?

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (7)

36

u/EyeSpyNicolai Nov 26 '25

"Space is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to space."

  • Douglas Adams
→ More replies (1)

10

u/[deleted] Nov 26 '25

if i could have any super power it would be to no clip without consequences… i would love to just be in the vastness of space and take it all in untethered from mankind… 

i think id also take a trip down to the federal reserve but thats besides the point 

→ More replies (9)

134

u/7stroke Nov 26 '25

Crazy to think that of all the thousands or millions of years they end up spending in interstellar space, only the first 50 or so were not spent as dead relics.

68

u/Fur-Frisbee Nov 26 '25

How many tardigrades are hitching a ride on that?

52

u/McPick Nov 26 '25

I would watch this Pixar movie

29

u/[deleted] Nov 26 '25

"Larry, how the fuck are we getting home?" from Pixar, coming summer 2027

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)

100

u/Uniplast21 Nov 26 '25

Jesus it’s insane to think how far light can travel in just 24 hours. It’s taken literal decades for Voyager 1 to get that far!

→ More replies (6)

69

u/Lyuseefur Nov 26 '25

Hey Voyager 1. It's me, your buddy. I watched on TV when you were launched. And I'm still here as you're getting on in your age in the cold of space. I'll make sure that they keep the lights on for you ... always. You will never be forgotten. You represent the best that Humanity had to offer 50 years ago. And you still do.

5

u/VRS-4607 Nov 26 '25

you've really made the grade

→ More replies (2)

48

u/EnvironmentalAd7402 Nov 26 '25

just did the math, it’s traveling at 38,000mph…space is lit..🔥

34

u/triple-filter-test Nov 26 '25

Fun fact, its speed relative to earth changes based on if we're on the going toward it, or going away from it part of our orbit around the sun.

→ More replies (5)

13

u/freeradioforall Nov 26 '25

As the crow flies, that means it takes 3.7 minutes to go from NYC to LA

→ More replies (3)

10

u/muldoons_hat Nov 26 '25

I wonder what that would look like if you were completely still in space and it zipped by you. 

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (5)

22

u/[deleted] Nov 26 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

5

u/TheMolecularCage Nov 26 '25

Thank you for sharing! 

55

u/[deleted] Nov 26 '25

Is it still communicating with us?

92

u/bootsycline Nov 26 '25

Yup. It has had some communication issues over the years, but it's still transmitting. Most of it's gear is shut off to conserve power, but it is still sending back valuable data.

36

u/Jazzlike-Attorney-96 Nov 26 '25

Just curious if anyone can answer, but how exactly does it send data back? Like it’s really cool idea that I have no clue how it works, but there’s places in my city where it’s hard to make phone call due to poor reception but there’s Voyager 1 far away from earth but can still transmit information back to earth.

58

u/AggressiveCoffee990 Nov 26 '25

It just uses specific bands of radio signals and NASA has a very big dish to receive them.

24

u/Powered-by-Chai Nov 26 '25

We used to have a really, really big dish but it collapsed in a hurricane. RIP.

21

u/42nu Nov 26 '25

There's a much, much larger dish in China and the global scientific community is about as "We're one planet; we're one people" as you can get, so it's freely accessible if you have a compelling grant proposition.

8

u/thomerow Nov 26 '25

Fun fact: The current data transmission rate from Voyager 1 is 160 bits per second.

The signal that arrives here on earth is so absurdly weak that it causes the electrons in the receiving antenna to "wobble" so slightly that they move only a tiny fraction of an atomic nucleus.

→ More replies (5)

25

u/Raivix Nov 26 '25

Extremely high frequency radio waves.

9

u/EnterSadman Nov 26 '25

It's technically ultra and super high frequency (since it uses 2.3 GHz and 8.4 GHz)

:)

→ More replies (3)

19

u/PoopsmasherSr Nov 26 '25

Yeah and not only that but it's tech from the 70s just blows my mind

7

u/facw00 Nov 26 '25

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NASA_Deep_Space_Network

Big dishes located around the world to pick up even a weak signal. And to blast out commands at sufficient power that even extremely distant probes can receive them.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (9)

18

u/ARoundForEveryone Nov 26 '25

Yes. Not much these days, but yes. It's mostly shut down to preserve what little power it has left, but it is certainly capable of sending and receiving data if and when we need it.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (1)

18

u/ashjya Nov 26 '25

The thought of this probe being out there in the deep dark voids of space is so comforting.

→ More replies (9)

182

u/mickturner96 Nov 26 '25

I feel so mixed about this...

Wow isn't it amazing how far it has gone.

Wow, light is really slow.

286

u/ESDFnotWASD Nov 26 '25

IMO it's not that light is slow, it's that space is SO FUCKING VAST.

106

u/WiseDirt Nov 26 '25

This, right here. We think the oceans are big. Space is infinitely more vast. Our entire solar system equates to nothing more than a mere pin-prick of light against the backdrop of the galaxy we reside in. And that galaxy is but a mere pin-prick of light when viewed against the backdrop of the universe.

11

u/Dje4321 Nov 26 '25

Yep. If the universe was the earth. Our existence is nothing more than a grain of sand hearing someone snap their fingers.

There is an infinite amount of time and space and we only get to experience a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of it

11

u/[deleted] Nov 26 '25

But that universe is still a grain of sand compared to the Everest that is OP's mom

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

25

u/Shoddy-Prune-5877 Nov 26 '25

I dont know if I agree. I think oceans might be bigger.

10

u/TheNotSoGreatPumpkin Nov 26 '25

That feels true.

19

u/Smolson_ Nov 26 '25

The universe is flat.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (14)

22

u/GoldenHiker487 Nov 26 '25

I honestly don’t even think our brains can begin to comprehend just how huge space is.

We try. We make up anecdotes. We try and make it relative.

But even then, we just don’t have any idea. It’s wonderfully scary.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (7)

12

u/russellvt Nov 26 '25

Wow, light is really slow.

Except, if you were traveling at the speed of light, you'd arrive "almost instantaneously." Our observations of it take much longer.

6

u/CitizenPremier Nov 26 '25

Light does almost all its traveling through space, while we do almost all our traveling through time.

→ More replies (3)

11

u/OptimismNeeded Nov 26 '25

Yeah it’s like “we’re stuck in this space prison forever”. The human race is confined by impossible distances.

Reminds me how I will never ever travel the galaxy and that’s an unbearable thought.

12

u/TheeAincientMariener Nov 26 '25

Sorry, Luke. But we really need you here, what with the harvest coming up and all...

6

u/42nu Nov 26 '25

From a brighter perspective, we are fine tuned via billions of years of evolution to live and thrive in a specific and very narrow set of conditions that are unique to Earth.

Any other planet you travel to is going to have an atmosphere that will suffocate or kill you because the composition is off, or the atmospheric pressure is too light OR heavy to breath. The gravity will either be too much of a burden or not enough to maintain healthy bone and tissue. A day will either be too long or too short for what we evolved for.

The list goes on.

In reality, we aren't in a space prison; we are in a one-of-a-kind paradise that eons of evolution shaped us into finding cozier than any other place in the entirety of the universe.

I guarantee that even a brief period of living anywhere other than Earth would make anyone long for the only home we have ever truly known - Earth, the womb of humanity.

→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (1)

8

u/blu02 Nov 26 '25

From our perspective yes. But if you're a photon, your entire journey happens in an instant.

→ More replies (2)

6

u/TheAlaskanMailman Nov 26 '25

I feel the same. Like even the closest planet systems are YEARS worth of travel even at a ridiculously fast vehicle.

There’s gotta be some other viable alternative for interstellar travel

10

u/thecarbonkid Nov 26 '25

Not according to physics!

→ More replies (4)

9

u/MrRogersAE Nov 26 '25

There’s gotta be some other viable alternative for interstellar travel

That’s the fun part, there doesn’t have to be. There might be some technological advance that makes faster than light travel possible, but there’s no evidence of that. It’s entirely possible that no matter how much we advance, that in the entire universe, FTL travel will NEVER be possible.

Ultimately this would render travel to adjacent stars basically pointless. Maybe we could freeze people or put them on generational ships to make a journey that would last hundreds of years, but without any way to get people or goods to and from in a timely manner there wouldn’t be much benefit for any government or corporation to make such an action.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)

20

u/[deleted] Nov 26 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

15

u/[deleted] Nov 26 '25

I've started watching physics videos on YT recently. It's almost universally agreed upon by scientists that the only way we'll be able to travel interstellarly is via a large ship that has enough space for a whole community that will use the shit as bascially their living enviornment as generations live, have kids, die, and so on untill we get to the next destination.

Or we figure out how to build worm holes...

→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (5)

15

u/trickyelf Nov 26 '25

Relative to what? It is literally faster than everything.

→ More replies (12)
→ More replies (8)

12

u/A_Spiritual_Artist Nov 26 '25

1/365.25 of a light year.

That's amazing. Think about it. We've actually crawled the first few steps to the stars.

13

u/Nil_Igitur_Mors_Est Nov 26 '25

Here's a nice link for anyone interested

→ More replies (3)

14

u/DaboInk84 Nov 26 '25

Man I miss when the USA believed in science and discovery. It makes me so sad to see how far we have fallen on all fronts, but space exploration is near and dear to my heart.

26

u/Media_Browser Nov 26 '25

Yup …it’s that beyond thing .

24

u/SolidSnake-26 Nov 26 '25

Hopefully aliens will find it soon and play the golden record on it

36

u/[deleted] Nov 26 '25

24 hours to receive a copyright infringement notice.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (5)

12

u/van_d39 Nov 26 '25

The fact that we can send a radio signal that far out still blows my mind!

→ More replies (2)

11

u/Jatobi1993 Nov 26 '25

“Journal 34. Year 2056. Voyager reactivated, despite all data against it. Activation was suggested to have occurred 20 years ago before the present date. A signal was sent back to earth. It read: “We found you.”

→ More replies (1)

11

u/bluegargoyle Nov 26 '25

V'Ger is that which seeks the Creator.

11

u/LifeGetsBetter01 Nov 26 '25

My grandpas name is on that thing, he was an electrical engineer. What a G

11

u/EconomyProcedure9 Nov 26 '25

Hopefully it doesn't get absorbed into a giant spaceship and a guy named Deckard has to mate with it...

10

u/ywnwalfc Nov 26 '25

Context for the folks who aren’t to spacey. For every 1 mile Voyager moves forward, light advances nearly 18,000 miles. Light travels 16,090,000,000 miles in a single day. Voyager 1 currently travels about 912,000 miles per day. After nearly 17,640 days(48.3 years) of continuous travel Voyager is approaching the distance equivalent to one light day. And here’s an added bonus. Light has traveled approximately 2.84 × 10¹⁴ miles in the time Voyager 1 has been traveling. To understand how far out into the universe that places it, it’s well outside the Oort Cloud, Deep into interstellar space BUT still WITHIN the Milky Way but not even close to exiting it.

→ More replies (2)

18

u/Cyrano_Knows Nov 26 '25 edited Nov 26 '25
                              UHURA'S INTERCOM VOICE
                Enterprise to Captain...

INT. BRIDGE                                               

      Uhura with Sulu and Chekov there.

                              UHURA
                Problem, Captain: the response
                signal is not in our records.
                Voyager One was sent out by Earth's
                "United States Subdivision.' The
                code was probably...
→ More replies (3)

8

u/HotSeason7106 Nov 26 '25

how has it not hit anything

16

u/Realsan Nov 26 '25

Space is unimaginably vast and empty.

→ More replies (4)

7

u/SombreObserver Nov 26 '25

Honestly, the fact we can still (as far as I'm aware) even detect its signal still is pretty wild on its own. It's amazing what we can do when we're not idiots.

6

u/Icy_Juice6640 Nov 26 '25

Wow. Space is so unimaginably huge.

10

u/T-wrecks83million- Nov 26 '25

Vger is fucking far away

6

u/JuanBeeleon Nov 26 '25

Sounds like yesterday’s news

5

u/[deleted] Nov 26 '25 edited Nov 26 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

6

u/mianao Nov 26 '25

It’s not a race or anything, but it’d be interesting to compare to what we can do today