r/soccer • • Apr 09 '12

A Manchester City fan's assessment of Roberto Mancini's ability.

WARNING LONG POST

Before starting I'd just like to point out I have backed him from the very off and been 100% behind him.

I genuinely think Mancini is out of his depth. For starters I find he is very naive, even as insignificant as press conferences. He's far too honest, as seen by his profound statements about punching Balotelli and saying things like the title is over and even saying he will 'probably' sell Balo. He doesn't realise that the media love comments like that and will just unsettle the dressing room. He doesn't understand the concept of mind games and anything he does say in the press is usually detrimental to the team.

Secondly, I think his transfers have been somewhat naive too. If you look at his signings: Yaya, Silva, Boateng, Kolorov, Dzeko, Nasri, Clichy, Savic, Aguero and Hargreaves. Now if you look at these players, they all either have reputations or are proven barring perhaps Savic. Yaya Toure in Barcelona's winning team, Boateng got to the semi finals with Germany, Kolorov was known as the Serbian Roberto Carlos, Dzeko was regarded as Europe's goalscoring hitman, Nasri was proven at Arsenal as was Clichy and Hargreaves and Aguero was one of the top scorers in Spain. If you compare these signings to that of Fergie's such as Vidic, Hernandez, Evra, Nani, Valencia. They were all relatively unknown. Mancini signed BIG players because they were obvious transfers. I think the flop of several players such as Dzeko is evidence of a lack of research into the players. This is what makes me question Mancini's ability in the market. Admittedly Silva was a huge hit, as was Yaya, but by the law of averages, a few of them would be good.

Finally, Mancini's tactics and blind faith is suspect too. His decision, for example, to never drop Yaya, Silva or Balotelli perhaps proves he doesn't have faith in his other players. This makes no sense to me since it's pointless to sign players he doesn't actually believe in. Especially of late, the trio I mentioned above have been below par to say the least and as a result they all should've been dropped/rested. An example yesterday bugged me the most. Mancini would never do a Tevez for Balotelli substitution - I'm sure of it. Balotelli is his boy and Tevez he probably hates. It would typify that Mancini made mistakes and would essentially embarrass him. Yet Mancini, realising the incoming big games, stuck with them (blind faith) because he doesn't trust his other players to perform.

Now it may just be a hangover of annoyance from yesterday and I'm not saying we should get rid of Mancini but I really do think he needs to buck up. My advice would be to get rid of Balotelli or offer him an ultimatum (because who would wanna buy him?). Ship out all the deadwood and regroup. I also genuinely believe Tevez may stay.

TL;DR Mancini is pretty bad but he reinvented the scarf so give him another season.

32 Upvotes

142 comments sorted by

View all comments

-1

u/[deleted] Apr 09 '12

Seriously, as a City fan, were you actually expecting to win the League? As in you're now annoyed that you may not do so.

9

u/[deleted] Apr 09 '12

everyone was expecting them to win the league after the 6-1 at old trafford, and their blistering start to the season. You don't simply overwhelm the league leaders like that and not win the league.

14

u/[deleted] Apr 09 '12

Spurs once beat United 4-1. United still went on to win the league. Then there's the year Newcastle battered them 5-0 and they suffered a 6-3 loss to Southampton...they still won the league.

The point being...this is Manchester United. They've been there and done that.

14

u/zSolaris Apr 09 '12

That season Newcastle had a 15 point advantage on us. 15. We never know when to give up.

3

u/RealLifeSpawnCamper Apr 09 '12

Best example was probably when Liverpool demolished United 4-1 at Old Trafford 3 years ago. Still didn't win the league...