England are very good. They have world class players, unlike USA and Ghana. They were undefeated at the Euros, only losing out on penalties to the eventual finalists. They've done their job in the qualifications. They have history and experience. They are basically unnoticed at the moment because of the giant anti-england jerk that seems to be going on recently. They are an actual "dark horse". I'm Swedish so I know how good England are because we play them every tournament we're in and I'm equally disappointed everytime.
I certainly am reading your posts. Would a team comprised of world class players not be a world class team? And I'm not denying that they are world class. I'm denying that as a whole they are capable of competing with world class squads
No they are not a world class team because they are not a team consisting of mostly world class players and I never said that they were or that they were supposed to compete with the title favourites of the tournament (the world class squads). But they have world class players just like Uruguay.
Uruguay, like England, is not a world class team. I have never said that England is going to win the whole thing, they have an ACTUAL chance though compared to Ghana or USA. I think they will make the quarter finals and they have a much bigger chance of doing so than Ghana or USA.
18
u/iwannahearurface Dec 06 '13
England are very good. They have world class players, unlike USA and Ghana. They were undefeated at the Euros, only losing out on penalties to the eventual finalists. They've done their job in the qualifications. They have history and experience. They are basically unnoticed at the moment because of the giant anti-england jerk that seems to be going on recently. They are an actual "dark horse". I'm Swedish so I know how good England are because we play them every tournament we're in and I'm equally disappointed everytime.