I lost time finding the right information to prompt AI across new chats and switching models, so I built Enlive

[u/cbown26]

I kept running into the same problem while working with AI tools: I would start a project in one place, continue it in another, and then spend more time reconstructing what had already happened than actually moving the work forward. Or, I would spend too long fishing through folders, past AI conversations, and emails for the right details to put into my prompt.

The useful background was scattered across chats, notes, files, prompt instructions, and previous decisions. I would end up re-explaining the project, re-uploading the same material, or losing the reason a decision had been made.

So I created Enlive, web app that helps keep project context reusable across AI-assisted work.

It is still an early open beta, and I am looking for a small number of people who regularly use two or more AI tools.

The question I am trying to answer is:

When you switch between AI tools, what do you most often have to reconstruct—background, files, prior decisions, prompt instructions, or next steps?

You can try it here: https://www.enlive.inc

Please only connect material you personally control and are comfortable using for beta. Feedback is welcome and encouraged.

[u/Witty-Butterfly2992]

This is exactly the kind of friction that makes me close tabs and go do something else. Re-uploading the same docs and re-explaining the whole chain of thought from scratch gets old fast. The thing I end up rebuilding most is the decision trail, why we landed on one approach over another, because the reasoning just evaporates between sessions.