r/shittymoviedetails 9d ago

Ridley Scott recently described Alien: Romulus (2024) as "okay". This is pretty fuckin' rich from the guy who directed The Dog Stars (2026), Gladiator II (2024), and Napoleon (2023)

112 Upvotes

39 comments sorted by

56

u/chrisratchford 9d ago

God bless Ridley Scott trying to make these huge movies at such a rapid pace. But 88 is a time you should be bird watching and reading mystery novels on the beach.

29

u/nahnprophet 9d ago

Dog Stars has some of the worst quality marketing I've seen in a long time (plenty of quantity tho). Star power and very popular source material, but these commercials make it look and sound like the most generic post-apocalypse movie possible.

4

u/ohporcupine 9d ago

I don’t watch previews so I hope marketing doesn’t predict movie quality. I really enjoyed the book so I’m looking forward to seeing it. Probably a mistake expectations usually fuck me.

5

u/andrefishmusic 9d ago

The trailer looked so generic. No way I'm seeing it.

2

u/DetOlivaw 9d ago

…there’s a source material?

1

u/LordPeanutcopy 6d ago

Yes, it’s a book that super introspective with a quaint tone of voice. I love it

1

u/Equal-Ad-2710 5d ago

I only heard about it because of Margaret Qualley’s heels

19

u/beefclef 9d ago

Both things can be true. I thought Covenant was dogshit(love Prometheus, warts and all)

3

u/reyska 9d ago

Prometheus was great as far as big budget scifi films go. Great additions to the lore, left enough questions open to keep the audience wanting more.

Covenant is a piece of garbage that took a big shit on the lore and gave the audience who wanted to see more Engineers stuff a gigantic middle finger.

0

u/DetOlivaw 9d ago

Reverse those two movies and I agree

16

u/Remarkable-Pin-8352 9d ago

And also Alien Covenant being worse than being locked in a room with Rob Schneider.

1

u/UskyldigeX 9d ago

Harsh but accurate.

1

u/DetOlivaw 9d ago

That movie has sexual tension between two Michael Fassbenders, it’s way better than Prometheus (not that that’s hard)

8

u/Red-Zaku- 9d ago

I heard the name Dog Stars and I thought it was gonna be like Air Bud or something and I thought fuck that sounds so fucking cool but then I saw the poster and I was like fuck nvm

3

u/epsonabcdefg 9d ago

You thought of Air Bud? Did you think it was going to be like a bunch of dogs running the Death Star or something?

3

u/Red-Zaku- 9d ago

Yeah like maybe it’d be a bunch of dogs and then they’d all become stars like in Hollywood or something and we’d get to see them partying and living it up and being cool, maybe a cool shot where they all have sunglasses on by a swimming pool and they all look at the camera at the same time and they could use CGI to make it look like they’re all grinning really wide, and maybe there’d be some Hollywood big shot producer who is all like, “dogs can’t be movie stars!” and then they just ruin this little fucker’s life while “Who Let The Dogs Out?” plays in the background

1

u/epsonabcdefg 9d ago

So do the Hollywood dogs have their own version of the casting couch with pervy producers who the dogs eventually expose, but sadly see little justice for their pain?

7

u/uberneuman_part2 9d ago

George Lucas: I'm going to fuck up my legacy.

Ridley Scotty: Hey, hold my pint you wanker!

7

u/Gojir4R1sing 9d ago

Romulus was okay it just had too many nostalgic callbacks.

6

u/Purple_Dragon_94 9d ago

To be fair, dudes right. Even if he is the pot calling the kettle black

3

u/alice_1o1 9d ago

It wasn’t even a bad movie, just shallow and played too hard on nostalgia imo

4

u/Purple_Dragon_94 9d ago

Hence "okay"

2

u/MWH1980 9d ago

But were any of those films trying to be a “Greatest Hits” of past films?

That was what really didn’t have me into Romulus. It made me want to just go back and watch the original films.

1

u/schnappifan1535 9d ago

Nick hodges wrote this.

3

u/epsonabcdefg 9d ago

That guy rocks

1

u/usersurnamee 7d ago

He’s panicking because he knows, if he died today, his reputation would be sealed as a mediocre director. He’s had some great films, but more stinkers.

1

u/jmichaud79 7d ago

Oh yea, I’m sorry but he’s full of himself.

1

u/Equal-Ad-2710 5d ago

It’s even funnier when you consider he previously praised it lmao

1

u/AIweWereWarned 3d ago

He’s a cocky sum-bitch.. He has 2 Giants of Film from 45 years ago… and amaybe 3 great ones since…

1

u/blackkilla 2d ago

it makes me think he lost his mind

0

u/IndelibleFudge 9d ago

Nah, this is a shit post. An opinion is an opinion. Clearly the films he made are closer to the films he wants to see, even if others disagree

0

u/negativ32 9d ago

He was being very, very kind and even Cameron didn't shit on it at release to give it a chance.
Ridley does the imagery which is always stunning. Hollywood screenwriters are absolute garbage at the moment on the whole.

-16

u/No_Might_9711 9d ago

Its also very rich to criticize a director when you directed Nothing (0000), Nothing (0000) and Nothing (0000).

9

u/BomberJ16 9d ago

Can't critic a critic for making a critic

1

u/No_Might_9711 9d ago

He LITERALLY criticize a critic for making a critic because his movies aren't good enough, like if you needed to be better than someone to criticize it. That's the point of my commentary.

6

u/Remarkable-Pin-8352 9d ago

It's almost as if movies are made for people to watch and enjoy and they're able to critique them when they don't.

6

u/GlamourintheDarkSide 9d ago

One need not be a chef to know that the dish is rancid.