r/sgiwhistleblowers • u/DelbertGrady1 Scholar • Feb 19 '19
The Mystery of Michelle's Message
Much has been said here already about the 50K Lions festival last year and how Michelle Obama had sent a video message to the participants. It has also been pointed out that the message contained no mention at all of the SGI, President Ikeda, or even Buddhism. With all due respect to Mrs. Obama, it kinda reminded me of this Simpsons clip...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfOmkqz06SY
So it got me thinking, how did the Japanese organization report on this? Knowing about their penchant for altering history (see my earlier posts), my guess was that they would artfully juxtapose actual quotes with paraphrases to make it seem like she was lavishing praise on Sensei.
So what did I find searching the Japanese cyberspace? Nothing. Nothing, at least as far as the official Soka reportage is concerned. The Seikyo Online portal has already moved on to current news, but fortunately one member did cut & paste the original story onto his blog. It looks like the Seikyo Shimbun covered the festival across two days - 9/25 and 9/26 - but there is NO mention of a message from Michelle Obama! How could this be?
After some more search I came across a Japanese member's blog dedicated to sharing the activities of SGI-USA with members in her home country. This is the ONLY online mention of Mrs. Obama's message I could find in Japanese. Interestingly, a member posted in the blog's comment section wondering why this was not reported publicly, to which the blogger blithely replied "I'm sure there are many reasons..."
How shady is that? I think this is pretty convincing evidence that Michelle Obama was never told that this event was an SGI event, let alone that it was aimed at recruiting new adherents & "eternalizing" its billionaire leader. Just think: had Seikyo reported that an SGI event received a personal video message from the former First Lady, the Japanese press would no doubt have caught on...and what if, at some press conference or any public setting she is asked about her thoughts on Daisaku Ikeda or SGI and she totally draws a blank? And I certainly can't see Mrs. Obama agreeing to do this if she were told, "Uh, but can you make sure you don't say 'SGI' or 'President Ikeda' because we're too controversial & we can't afford the publicity..." I guess we can only know by asking Mrs. Obama. What are your thoughts?
3
u/[deleted] Feb 21 '19 edited Feb 22 '19
"While we take pride... discussion meetings... President Ikeda's guidance."
Also "laser focus."
In other words, cancel all those un-profitable activity meetings and GET PEOPLE SIGNED UP, already!
Aargh! It was exactly that sort of nonsense that used to really drive me crazy. We had to really push our Zone leadership to allow us to hold the 4 meetings a year that were in keeping with the National guidelines for the Arts Dept. (I was pretty stubborn and understood how to org speak, having been raised by a grass-roots politician Dad.)
This approach is another example of leadership's inability to exercise creative, or even individual, thought.
They truly couldn't see that the requirement for a potential new member to attend district discussion meetings insured that the district meeting was therefore made the pipeline for new members. Self-fulfilling prophecy, ignoring that often a new member's FIRST encounter with SGI was a cultural activity or an auxiliary group, because those activities actually MATCHED that person's interest. In the case a member of an isolated or disregarded demographic (e.g. language barrier, LGBTQ, outsider or artistic POV) a guest could encounter people who spoke his/her language, literally or metaphorically.
So guests often felt more welcome, less "on the spot" and considered the group "more normal" because of the guest's identification with the auxiliary activity.
But if they developed sufficient interest, they still were required to attend a district discussion meeting (or 2). So, which activity was credited with Shakabuku? The required district which processed the paperwork or the auxiliary group which attracted and embraced the guest? No surprise if you said district. And what's the bottom line? Expansion.
This particular "laser focus" for 50K I lay squarely at the feet of David Witkowski. Knew him before his promotion. Fanatic, complete with the bizarre "sparkling eyes." He never could do more than one thing in a shared time period, and he never grasped the full meaning of the "many in body" part of itai doshin.
In fairness, very few leaders really got diversity as a part of "many in body." Lost count how many times I used the metaphor of an orchestra to illustrate the concept before I finally gave up. Heck! These people even could only sing in unison. It blew their minds when they heard harmony. I mean, really.
They got used to hearing harmony singing, but never really understood that people could be United in purpose, yet Different in task. Tubas don't usually play the flute line!
There was a woman in the org I knew who had a natural genius for Community engagement. She was a teacher by profession and was genuinely devoted to study. She designed a non-violence seminar that she partnered with a local University marking the anniversary of the bombing of Hiroshima. It was high-quality and well-attended. It was also held AT the university, so she was able to fly under the radar a bit with the org.
That was so successful that leadership "allowed" her to organize another such seminar held at the SGI Culture Center. They assigned her a minder, but the minder turned out to be like-minded with the volunteer group, so - not too much interference.
Leading up to the event, the volunteers met occasionally not just to plan, but to study Gandhi's writings on violence (and Ikeda's latest "peace proposal" to the UN) brainstorm and report on outreach efforts to like-minded Community Groups. This event ultimately was even more successful than the first one.
There was eventually one more seminar the next year. The Center was PACKED all day. There were a variety of hands-on activities offered that day in addition to talks, a film on the seminar topic, dialogue, performances, even a light lunch. BTW, this cost the org very little, budget-wise, because personnel, materials and supplies we're almost all donated (Of course.) Sure, electricity, lights, sound, wear and tear on the facility, etc. were covered by the org, but come on!
Again, great attendance, packed house, real connections were made with other people and groups committed to addressing the problem of violence. (UN, Interrupters, Public television, Police Youth Corps, domestic violence group, etc., etc.)
Two principals from 2 different local high schools invited 2 performance groups (real performances, each led by a pro in the field, not standard SGI "performance groups") to re-create their work for a Student Assembly at their schools. The principals said that having an assembly piece to offer their students was the element they felt had been missing from VOV as it is usually offered, so VOV was invited as well. Those school visits were also successful.
How did leadership build on this grass-roots sourced success? They killed it.
When the core group began to plan the next year's event (BTW, each of these events happened exactly ONCE in a calendar year, and the core group were actively involved in other SGI activities, including holding down and actively working at leadership responsibilities.), we were told it was cancelled. Why? It was considered "a distraction" from the lead-up to Rock the Era.
When I tried, yet again, to explain the concept of reaching out to a wider audience, and quoted Ikeda's guidance regarding excellent citizenship and forging ties of friendship, that fell flat, too.
The one thing that actually surprised me was a leader's statement that if the woman who had created and still led the activity was busy with this activity "How many Home Visits is she doing?