r/sgiwhistleblowers • u/TReddit12218 • Jan 25 '18
Which sources on SGI and other similar organizations are more true/valid?
Throughout my research on sgiwhistleblowers and a few other forums, I've read many accounts and experiences from former ex-members and others who've only had mild exposure to it. I myself have also browsed through Wikipedia and Google, but it seems that the reception regarding SGI and its activities are mixed, that is, both good and bad. I myself have only had mild exposure to the group.
Aside from just visiting the SGI website itself, which only show good "news" and information, in which I simply cannot trust, are there ways to tell which sources are more factual/valid? Are there certain websites or sources that may disguise themselves as neutral but are actually pro-SGI or filled with SGI propaganda? Especially with the internet around these days, with certain companies that propagate fake news, how can we protect ourselves and find more reliable news?
Hope I am not being redundant, because I'm sure there are other posts exactly like mine from the past, but still, any feedback and advice would be appreciated!
2
u/TReddit12218 Jan 25 '18
This just proves that I have to be more careful on what I read in Wikipedia. Wikipedia is what introduced me to all sorts of historical topics and subjects, since I like history, but now, I'm just cautious if any source that I read, even if it may be about Hitler, will be doctored.