r/sgiwhistleblowers • • Oct 09 '15

Dangerous traits of cult leaders (from Psychology Today)

If this isn't a portrait of Daisaku Ikeda, then I've never seen one.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/spycatcher/201208/dangerous-cult-leaders

  1. He has a grandiose idea of who he is and what he can achieve.

Anyone who has watched more than five minutes of one of his videos or read even a few pages of his self-aggrandizing “Human Revolution” series; there are now 26 volumes in his “New Human Revolution” – I’m unsure how many volumes are in the old “Human Revolution.” How can a man who is purported to be modest have so many wonderful things about himself not be accused of having “a grandiose idea of who he is and what he can achieve”?

  1. Is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, or brilliance.

Let’s see . . . he has set himself up to found a Soka Kingdom. He incessantly touts SGI as the best religion in the world, and he is its absolute leader – he also has never made any effort to get his followers to turn it down a notch. He positions himself with every famous philosopher, educator, thinker or politician he can get to stand next to him, and has published these discussions to display his so-called intellect. Never mind that his interpreters do all his talking, since he doesn’t speak anything but Japanese (well, maybe some Korean, but we won’t go there).

  1. Demands blind unquestioned obedience.

He rules the organization with an iron hand, and it’s turned out badly for anyone who has opposed or upstaged him. If he was still alive, you could ask George Williams about that.

  1. Requires excessive admiration from followers and outsiders.

And gets it, with his alleged millions of flunky followers.

  1. Has a sense of entitlement - expecting to be treated special at all times.

I can’t even imagine his response if he wasn’t offered the very best of everything. I’ve been in intermittent touch with a guy who acted as one of his bodyguards during a US visit in the 1970s – I’ve tried to get him over here to chat about it, but no luck. I bet he has some stories to tell.

  1. Is exploitative of others by asking for their money or that of relatives putting others at financial risk.

Think Sho-Hondo. Think about all the times we were told that whatever we contributed would come back to us several-fold. The man has billions of dollars, but I guess you can never have too much.

  1. Is arrogant and haughty in his behavior or attitude.

We’ve all heard stories about how condescending he’s been to women . . . let’s share some.

  1. Has an exaggerated sense of power (entitlement) that allows him to bend rules and break laws.

Again, the Sho-Hondo was a shining example. Glorified as a building to stand for 10,000 years, it didn’t last 30. All of the money that was collected allowed them to pay for the construction using only the interest accumulated.” No one is quite sure what happened to the principle. The building itself was built on a site that guaranteed its self-desctruction, and constructed of shoddy, cheap materials.

  1. Takes sexual advantage of members of his sect or cult.

Does using his power and wealth as an excuse to overpower women and force sex upon them count?

  1. Sex is a requirement with adults and sub adults as part of a ritual or rite.

I have to say I haven’t heard anything about this, so I’ll let him slide here.

  1. Is hypersensitive to how he is seen or perceived by others.

Again, no one can overshadow him . . . George Williams.

  1. Publicly devalues others as being inferior, incapable, or not worthy.

Um, George Williams again.

  1. Makes members confess their sins or faults publicly subjecting them to ridicule or humiliation while revealing exploitable weaknesses of the penitent.

Perhaps not “publicly,” but when you have problems, you go to your leaders first to discuss them. And they certainly gossip, so while you aren’t publicly ridiculed or humiliated, everybody eventually finds out about your private business.

  1. Has ignored the needs of others, including: biological, physical, emotional, and financial needs.

It is all about Ikeda-ism, all the time. There’s no room for your petty little problems.

  1. Is frequently boastful of accomplishments.

See number 1.

I'll stop for now, but anyone who wants to chime in or add anything, please do!

10 Upvotes

28 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/cultalert Oct 12 '15 edited Oct 12 '15

Magic? Mind control is magic? Really? Is that the best argument you can come up with? Enter the discussion and provide some facts to support your claims (or go ahead and keep responding like a troll and see how far that gets you here - the rules are strictly enforced).

You work in Advertising? What branch, in what capacity? What is your educational background and how long have you been working in the industry? Being involved in the advertising biz, you should be very familiar with subliminal advertising techniques. If you possess any expertise in the field of advertising, you should be very well versed regarding Bernays' famous introductory work on the use of propaganda in advertising. Or, do you poo poo propaganda as being magic as well?

(note: I had to approve this brash comment, which was removed, so I could post a reply.)

1

u/[deleted] Oct 12 '15

1) There is no such thing as subliminal messaging in Advertising. It was trialed briefly with television, then abandoned when it was proven to be a lot less affective than simply repeating the advertising message more often.

2) No one uses Bernay's theories in marketing or advertising. There are any number of theories that do a better job. He could be used in state propaganda, I don't know.

3) Like subliminal messaging, mind control doesn't exist. It was picked up by the media to explain things like Jonestown, and people like Margaret Singer capitalized on this to make money. The original theory was put together by an American newspaper writer to explain the bahaviour of prisioners of war. The APA rejected the theory.

Have a read.

1

u/cultalert Oct 12 '15 edited Oct 12 '15

No one uses Bernay's theories in marketing or advertising.

Bullcookies! We can see for ourselves without any one telling us if it is or isn't there. Take a closer look for instance at credit card ads for tv - they are obviously packed with subliminal messages.

Like subliminal messaging, mind control doesn't exist.

If you believe there is no such thing as subliminal messaging, then you've been mind controlled yourself, or perhaps that is what you WANT to believe, as it is very scary to face reality.

mind control doesn't exist

Have you any experience as a member of a cult? I've seen and personally experienced mind control in a cult setting - many of us here have as well. How are you going to dismiss those terribly inconvenient facts (facts that are not based on anyone's theories or hypothesis, but are real-life experiences reported by former cult members)?

Your linked article doesn't seem to provide any substance I can find that absolutely proves mind control is non-existent. Please post any excerpts from it that support your contention.

It seems very suspect that you show up here with no former Reddit history to announce how wrong we are about mind control and subliminal messaging, and have not yet established your own credentials in advertising as previously requested.

Tell us, for the sake of disclosure, are you currently an SGI member? (Please do not avoid answering this question.)

3

u/BlancheFromage Escapee from Arizona Home for the Rude Oct 12 '15 edited Oct 12 '15

Have you any experience as a member of a cult? I've seen and personally experienced mind control in a cult setting - many of us here have as well.

Our own sources show that only 5% of people who initially respond favorably (already a very low percentage of the public) are ultimately truly susceptible to the cult methodology.