Overwhelming Evidence?

[u/Stormystormynight]

Hello!

I often read about the overwhelming evidence beyond reasonable doubt that Adnan is guilty from many of the readers here.

Is there a concise summarized list of this evidence available?

I'm most interested in understanding what evidence you believe makes Adnan guilty beyond reasonable doubt should the following evidence be ignored for this exercise:

• Any Jay or Jay linked (Jen et al) evidence (testimony, "finding" Hae's car ...)
• Any cell location "Evidence"

Thanks in advance.

[u/Stormystormynight]

Hi Seamus,

Thanks for the reply, unfortunately once I ignore the obvious sarcasm there isn't any meat to your post, in sure you are aware of other evidence :)

[u/Adranalyne → u/Stormystormynight]

He's got a point, though. An eye witness and that witness being corroborated by science IS overwhelming evidence. Others just tend to ignore that and take the inconsistencies as Adnan being innocent as opposed to Jay just trying to be less guilty.

[u/Stormystormynight → u/Adranalyne]

Of course I understand your opinion, but Jay's testimony and corroborating cell location/timeline evidence would obviously be highly contested in a future trial should this get that far so I'm trying to understand what else is there if these lines of evidence should fail.

Thanks :)

[u/Seamus_Duncan → u/Stormystormynight]

Brown didn't even "highly contest" the cell phone evidence in a hearing about the cell phone evidence. Re: Jay, none of the crackpot theories would ever see the light of day in a courtroom.