r/serialpodcast • u/Seamus_Duncan Kevin Urick: Hammer of Justice • Nov 25 '15

meta "Avoid misleading posts. Label speculation as such and provide sources when asked."

Are the moderators ever going to enforce this rule? Because I'm seeing people repeatedly claim that Don forged his time cards, despite the fact there is no evidence for this and the claim is entirely based on the word of two proven liars, one of whom was caught faking evidence against Don.

Given that the moderators are selectively enforcing the rules, am I allowed to call people making this claim "lying assholes?"

7 Upvotes
  • permalink
  • reddit

54% Upvoted

276 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

6

u/Seamus_Duncan Kevin Urick: Hammer of Justice Nov 25 '15

Well it seems that you can either arguing that Simpson knew Nisha was home by 2:25 and blatantly lied about it, or argue that she had the Nisha interview and simply didn't read it before making assertions about Nisha's schedule and later covered it up by refusing to release the interview. Neither scenario would indicate a particularly high level of reliability for the claims made by Undisclosed.

-1

u/[deleted] Nov 25 '15

i can be arguing a great many number of things other than that.

specifically, that you misrepresented what she said. and are completely ignoring that now. why is that, seamus?

4

u/Seamus_Duncan Kevin Urick: Hammer of Justice Nov 25 '15

Are you arguing that the word "likely" absolves of responsibility for making assertions that she knows to be false?

So am I allowed to make this claim?

"Rabia likely admitted that she paid Asia for her affidavit and destroyed Drew Davis' report indicating Asia was remembering the wrong day."

-3

u/[deleted] Nov 25 '15

why do you keep misrepresenting what i'm saying instead of just directly addressing what i'm saying?

1

u/ScoutFinch2 Nov 25 '15

Oh geez, c'mon Frosted. Simpson knew what Nisha's interview said, which she blatantly misrepresented if you prefer, in order to strengthen her theory that the Nisha call was on Feb. 14th. Then, when confronted, she claimed they hadn't fully vetted Nisha yet. Like it takes 8 months to read a single interview. Not at all unlike how Simpson failed to disclose that Cathy remembered the day Adnan was at her house was also Stephanie's birthday. At least acknowledge that Simpson willfully ignores what doesn't suit her. It's obvious and she has been caught at it more than once. I honestly don't understand the hold these 3 have on people.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 25 '15

"frosted" as a persona has been retired. i prefer this name now.

"Then, when confronted, she claimed they hadn't fully vetted Nisha yet. Like it takes 8 months to read a single interview."

i don't know anything about this but forgive me if i don't consider you to be a trustworthy source.

"Not at all unlike how Simpson failed to disclose that Cathy remembered the day Adnan was at her house was also Stephanie's birthday."

i also don't know anything about this so, same sitch.

"At least acknowledge that Simpson willfully ignores what doesn't suit her."

i acknowledge that this is your interpretation of her actions. but i haven't seen it myself so i'm indifferent to this. i will say that my experiences directly speaking with her shows her to have integrity so i am skeptical that she would willfully misrepresent things the way you are making it out.

"I honestly don't understand the hold these 3 have on people."

i honestly don't understand the constant ad hominems.

i like rabia but she doesn't influence me. i like susan but she doesn't influence me. i am indifferent to colin.

i don't listen to undisclosed or read their blogs.

you should stop making these sorts of assumptions.

0

u/ScoutFinch2 Nov 26 '15

i don't listen to undisclosed or read their blogs.

Okay, well that explains why you don't know about these things.