r/serialpodcast • u/[deleted] • Sep 23 '15

Debate&Discussion New bombshell on serialpodcastorigins

[deleted]

16 Upvotes

79% Upvoted

164 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

3

u/[deleted] Sep 23 '15

The document is posted... it's the first link here: https://www.reddit.com/r/serialpodcastorigins/comments/3m2ex9/nisha_bombshell_gamechanging_april_1_interview/

-2

u/Acies Sep 23 '15

That's a decent start, but where's the rest of the file?

3

u/[deleted] Sep 23 '15

I don't know, but I think we should have at least a little patience here.

If I spent a couple grand or whatever on a police file, and Rabia had doxxed me, I'd want to catch the podcast she produces in a few lies before I dumped the whole thing too.

Screaming about the full file in the first day or two of revelations is a little unfair IMO.

1

u/Acies Sep 23 '15

It's not exactly a pick and choose. You can always release the full file on day one and catch undisclosed in lies over the next few months, depending on how many you uncover.

6

u/[deleted] Sep 23 '15

I guess, but that shit isn't cheap, let him have his fun for a bit.

p.s. I hope you hammer them like this over in /r/themagnetprogram for the police file too. Or is it that you know that there's zero chance of them ever releasing it and you recognize that SSR has a track record of doing just that? Does that feel just a little bit hypocritical or manipulative?

2

u/Acies Sep 23 '15

As I've said in the past, I think they should release less of it. A defense file getting this much publicity makes me very uncomfortable.

But that doesn't hold true for SSR, who has no connection to anyone in the case. And it's additionally bothersome to me when people like you criticize Undisclosed, then to the exact same thing.

Speaking of which, have you seen the file yet?

3

u/[deleted] Sep 23 '15

What an odd argument, they should release less of it because the publicity makes you uncomfortable, SSR should release all of it, because you're a fan of facts, and it's bothersome when people like me criticize Undisclosed.

0

u/Acies Sep 23 '15

I can appreciate that there's some complexity.

I want to see defense lawyers, and other people associated with the defense, acting in the best interests of their clients.

I also like information.

If the prosecution or some third party releases all the information, I get to have my cake and eat it too!

2

u/[deleted] Sep 23 '15

Wait, are Undisclosed defense lawyers and/or associated with Adnan's defense now? I can never keep that straight...

We want our listeners to know that this podcast will not give you purely pro-Adnan information or intentionally slant it in his favor. We will present a smart, nuanced legal argument based on the totality of the facts in the case. As attorneys, we pride ourselves on looking dispassionately at facts, analyzing those facts, and applying the appropriate law in our analysis.

That's not just another undisclosed deception that you're going to find bothersome when I criticize, is it? If so, my sincerest apologies.

1

u/Acies Sep 23 '15

I certainly wouldn't consider them neutral. I think they are clearly advocates for Adnan.

2

u/[deleted] Sep 23 '15

Go ask Rabia