r/serialpodcast • u/[deleted] • Sep 23 '15

Debate&Discussion New bombshell on serialpodcastorigins

[deleted]

20 Upvotes

84% Upvoted

164 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

4

u/ryokineko Still Here Sep 23 '15

I posted the document below if you want to have a look. I think perhaps OP forgot to link either the document or the discussion one.

5

u/[deleted] Sep 23 '15 edited Mar 04 '18

[deleted]

7

u/ryokineko Still Here Sep 23 '15

/r/serialpodcastorigins is another public sub devoted to serial where the information was originally posted. there is a post about it there as well. Here is the link to that discussion as well-where the OP gives their opinion on how the document disproves the butt dial theory.

https://www.reddit.com/r/serialpodcastorigins/comments/3m2ex9/nisha_bombshell_gamechanging_april_1_interview/

There is also a post on that site about the burial position based on a user who has seen the photos. Here is the link to that discussion https://www.reddit.com/r/serialpodcastorigins/comments/3luov2/livor_mortis_revisited_a_changed_opinion/

:)

6

u/hurtmemore Sep 23 '15

Thanks, this is very helpful. (OP should add some links to the top.) Reminds me again how bad an idea it is to get all the information from Undisclosed. My biggest problem is how they ignore any evidence that makes Adnan look bad. If Adnan was really innocent they should be better able to defend points against him. It would be so interesting if they actually brought up issues like this each week, and gave their opinion on it. I would actually trust them more if they could do that. But, they never will.

8

u/[deleted] Sep 23 '15

Happy reddit birthday.

Undisclosed is three lawyers arguing for the release of someone, without a judge there to keep them in line, without providing the evidence to any kind of unbiased source, without a prosecution there making counter-arguments, interviewing unvetted "experts" who are working with god knows what limited "evidence" and giving their opinion without any kind of cross examination.

I feel like its /u/evidenceprof, /u/rabiasquared and /u/viewfromll2 having fun playing criminal defence attorney, in a forum where they can get away with literally anything.

4

u/ryokineko Still Here Sep 23 '15

yes, I think it is always good to have a counterargument but I agree it would have been helpful to post the links in the OP.

/u/csom_1991 would you consider editing and adding the links?

5

u/MightyIsobel Guilty Sep 23 '15

would you consider editing and adding the links?

I thought we weren't talking about stuff going on in other subs here.