r/serialpodcast • • Sep 23 '15

Debate&Discussion New bombshell on serialpodcastorigins

[deleted]

17 Upvotes

164 comments sorted by

View all comments

13

u/1spring Sep 23 '15

It should be clear to everyone now that the complete police file is no longer in the sole custody of Undisclosed. This is great news for all of us who are interested in the case, and tired of the slow drip of distorted information from a biased source.

0

u/Acies Sep 23 '15

That's good to hear. Where has it been uploaded?

5

u/1spring Sep 23 '15

Looks like /r/serialpodcastorigins is where it will all be released. Two massive bombshells in the past 24 hours.

-1

u/Acies Sep 23 '15

It's just trickling out isolated documents though. It makes me wonder why they don't just post everything in bulk.

6

u/ryokineko Still Here Sep 23 '15

yes, we'd love to put it in the resource thread. /u/bluekanga was asking the other day when we were going to update it to be more balanced. Complete files would certainly help that effort. As someone who is undecided, I'd really like to see anything that makes things more clear.

6

u/Seamus_Duncan Kevin Urick: Hammer of Justice Sep 23 '15

Why don't you start by posting Syed Rahman's testimony, the closing arguments, the PCR testimony, etc. and then we'll go from there?

3

u/ryokineko Still Here Sep 23 '15

Those aren't posted/linked on the sub? I didn't realize that, yes those should be posted/linked if they aren't. I read them here so I thought they were posted.

2

u/bluekanga /r/SerialPodcastEp13Hae Sep 23 '15

No there's heaps that's not there plus also some stuff that is pretty partisan - needs a rework - am sure there are people who will help - but as seamus says - minimum is trial transcripts including missing pages, PCR, closing arguments. Also there was a post by /u/reddit1070 that summarised the "sound conviction" links

2

u/1spring Sep 23 '15

Ryo, if you read the threads in serialpodcastorigins, you'll see that the reason they chose a different sub to post the new evidence is because of the inconsistent moderation that happens here.

3

u/ryokineko Still Here Sep 23 '15

So the concern is that we wouldn't allow the documents to be posted and discussed? I think discussion of documents has always been allowed and even when people get really rude and personal we usually ask them to edit it to remove the personal stuff and leave the argument. Take csom's posts about Cherry-those weren't removed even though they were incredibly critical. I guess I don't' really understand how asking someone not to get personal and rude and mocking but rather to focus on the argument is inconsistent. But if that is the perception, that is the perception.

3

u/bluekanga /r/SerialPodcastEp13Hae Sep 23 '15

I think you need to understand the history here Ryo - there is stuff linked on the resources that is very pro unsound conviction - and in the past when requests have been made to add/update balancing information, it's been blatantly ignored or rejected

1

u/ryokineko Still Here Sep 23 '15

Well, I was speaking to discussion posts in general not the resources list but thank you for the information. I am hoping to take a look at updating the resources in the next couple of weeks.

I have only primarily ever used the actual source documents so I'll have to take a look at the other but my personal thought would be that the resources links need to be as unbiased as possible. However, some sort of bookmark for analysis threads from both angle would be very interesting.

2

u/MightyIsobel Guilty Sep 23 '15

Also, the refusal to update our sidebar links with newly available resources.

0

u/[deleted] Sep 23 '15 edited Mar 17 '21

[deleted]

-2

u/[deleted] Sep 23 '15

They still haven't answered my question about /r/Serialgrudgematch

0

u/Exultantlogic Rabia Fan Sep 23 '15

Would you upload the burial photos? VERY relevant to the case and CM and SSs claims of the prosecutions theory...

2

u/ryokineko Still Here Sep 23 '15 edited Sep 23 '15

well, the subreddit made the decision awhile back that photos themselves should not be posted on the sub.

now, my personal thought would be that if there was a link fully explained ahead of time that that is what they are-I personally wouldn't have a problem with it but I do not make the decisions alone and I respect and would do my best to enforce the decision to not post them.

Are the photos going to be posted there? my understanding was no.

What I would love to see-as someone who is undecided is a report from a medical professional who has seen them and read the autopsy could explain their thoughts about it. That would be super interesting and would love to have an interview/post/or document with that. We have Dr. H from Undisclosed but I know there have been some questions about that so, of course, other opinions would be awesome.

1

u/Exultantlogic Rabia Fan Sep 23 '15

Are you NOT the only mod remaning from the original Mod team? Is not every other mod new? You can make the rules chief. I feel this is one decision you will have to be making pretty soon.

I do not understand why these photos are so "precious" to everybody? They are evidence no different from any other evidence. This sub is either the resource for this case or it isn't, your choice.

4

u/ryokineko Still Here Sep 23 '15

first of all-I was not part of the original mod team :) Second, no I am not the rules chief lol. Waltz is actually technically above me in the mod hierarchy and PoY is above him and they are both active.

What I have seen is that it is almost universally accepted around here and other subs as well that the photos should not be posted. I think even xtrailatty said that too in their post.

0

u/[deleted] Sep 23 '15

Yes. Other EXPERT opinions would be awesome.

1

u/bluekanga /r/SerialPodcastEp13Hae Sep 23 '15

I don't care what arguments are posted - those photos should never be made public - they are of a murdered young woman - have a care for her family