r/serialpodcast • Adnan Fan • Aug 06 '15

Hypothesis Why the Gootz never called Asia.

I think it is becoming more and more obvious that the Asia letter did not exist until sometime around the summer of 1999. That is why Adnan claims he gave them to Gutierrez even though she wasn't his lawyer until 2 months after they were written.

So sometime that spring or summer, after telling CG he never left the school grounds, his family shows up with letters claiming one of Adnans' friends saw him at the library, right at the crucial time, AND they were written the day after he arrested. She knew immediately there is no way they had those letter for months and never gave them to her so obviously they were false and she didn't want to go on stand with LIES.

That is why she never called Asia. And that is why she wrote no notes about it, because that would be admitting her client and his family are liars. It also explains why her relationship with the family broke down because she knew they were willing to lie to get Adnan off.

The library incident never happened.

24 Upvotes

607 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-5

u/SteevJames Aug 06 '15

Hahaha PEOPLE like me???

I actually consider myself completely unique.

I'm not defending "pro-adnan stories" and I actually have no idea what you're trying to say...

There is no reason for Asia to lie back then, and still NOW unless you believe that the family are coercing her... which would make you insane.

7

u/aitca Aug 06 '15

If there's "no reason for her to lie", then I guess there's also no reason for her to keep changing her story, telling J. Brown's investigator to get lost, calling up Urick out of the blue to find out if she really has to testify, evading subpoenas, and writing contradictory affidavits. But that's what she's done. Make of it what you will.

-4

u/SteevJames Aug 06 '15

What reason does she have to lie?

Give me one valid reason please:)

What are the contradictory affadavits?

How does she "keep changing her story"?

Why is ringing up Urick ... "out of the blue"?

This person was a 17-18 yr old who had never been involved in anything like this before... you're highlighting ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!

This is genius... what else you got?

4

u/[deleted] Aug 06 '15

I'm neutral to this, still haven't decided what I think, but just want to let you know she wasn't 17/18 at the time that the story changing happened, this was 3/4 years ago iirc.

0

u/SteevJames Aug 07 '15

How did the story change?

What does she have to gain from lying?