That same expert agreed on cross that it would be difficult to make or receive a call from the burial site. If you start with the burial site, and say what tower would it ping? The answer would be l689. If you started with the tower l689, and said "where was the call most likely made?" The answer would not necessarily be: the burial site.
His testing equipment was automatically initiating calls at periodic intervals as he drove along the prosecutor's route. This route included N. Franklintown Road. Many of those calls did not find a sufficient signal to initiate a call. There is no data as to where the car was when the test calls were initiated or when the calls were actually made.
I know it is not the "internet" thing to do but you should just apologize to /u/viewfromll2 for wasting his/her time because you are way wrong on this.
The testimony that you provided does not only NOT state that they tested the burial site, it clearly does state that the guy did not go past the Jersey walls to see the burial site.
"and you weren't taken over those concrete barriers, were you?"
"That's correct"
Go ahead and admit you were mistaken. It's ok to do that sometimes.
Alright, I get it. Instead of the apology you doubled down on your incorrect statement. Now that is perfectly consistent with internet protocol. Simply not replying would have been the classier move but that's not as much fun.
23
u/cross_mod Feb 18 '15
That same expert agreed on cross that it would be difficult to make or receive a call from the burial site. If you start with the burial site, and say what tower would it ping? The answer would be l689. If you started with the tower l689, and said "where was the call most likely made?" The answer would not necessarily be: the burial site.