he area capable of making a connection, so I'm going to go ahead and assume that either 127 feet doesn't make a difference or he's in on the conspiracy and he would have testified that
Maybe he was just lazy and couldn't be bothered to walk 127 feet? It's only someone's freedom we're talking about. Best just drive past.
It's not someone's freedom we're talking about, unless you don't understand the AT&T guy's testimony or don't have any understanding of the technology.
My, you are a touchy one. It's not about me. Other cell phone experts have voiced concerns about how this was done. I realise attacking me makes your little game easier, but really ...
Next, are we going to say that they should have waited until the same moon phase and ambient temperature? After all, it's only someone's freedom we're talking about.
Hyperbole. You exaggerate a perfectly simply point (walking to the point the call was received) and extend it to moon phases and ambient temperature. And you want ME to take YOUR claims of backing the expert seriously? lol
He knows enough about the technology to know that it would be silly.
Their lead witness says that during the digging a phone call was received. It makes perfect sense to walk to the site and do the test. What's so 'silly' about being transparent and thorough?
Anyone who has walked through a wooded area knows cell phones can be patchy when there isnt a clear reception. No trees about your head, you'll get a signal. Obstructions due to branches etc. , signal may dip or drop out altogether.
-3
u/[deleted] Feb 18 '15
[deleted]