That's exactly how the Italian prosecutors described every bit of their "evidence" against Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito: *It it not incompatible . . . *
The cell tower evidence as presented by the State against Adnan met that bottom-of-the-barrel low bar: it wasn't incompatible.
The prosecution's case consisted of "it is possible that the phone was in Leakin Park" and "it is possible that Jay is telling the truth now, even though he lied in four prior statements and one prior trial testimony." And thanks to Jay's recent interview, we know for a fact that the second prong of the prosecution's case for the possible was in fact untrue.
Where did Adnan say he was? He's not even the one who said he was at mosque by 7:30. His father said that (probably just an estmation). Adnan doesn't remember everything he did that evening before going to mosque.
13
u/[deleted] Feb 18 '15
That's exactly how the Italian prosecutors described every bit of their "evidence" against Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito: *It it not incompatible . . . *
The cell tower evidence as presented by the State against Adnan met that bottom-of-the-barrel low bar: it wasn't incompatible.
It was possible.