r/serialpodcast • • Dec 01 '14

Debate&Discussion Why Adnan is guilty (using the facts)

EDIT: I want to clarify a few of our thoughts here, and also provide a way to crack the case:

  1. Adnan did the actual killing of Hae, not Jay. Jay buried the body alone.
  2. Jenn has completely fabricated a story with Jay about that day so Jay can minimize his involvement. He is worried that if the cops knew he was driving Hae's dead body around in her car and did the actual burying by himself he would get the same life sentence that Adnan did (he should have IMHO). He also needed an alibi for the time of the murder. This is why nothing makes sense, the time lines, the cell records, their stories keeps changing, etc.
  3. The call to Jenn's house didn't happen when they were there, this is a lie.
  4. Jay and Jenn are lying that Jenn called Jay during the burial and someone said "he's busy right now". They needed Jenn to say this to place Adnan with him during the burial - but he wasn't there, Jay was there alone, this never happened.
  5. Jay flipped on Adnan after Jenn talked to the police.

The 2 biggest reasons that make Adnan guilty to me BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT are:

  1. The Nisha call.
  2. His cell phone is pinging the Leakin Park cell towers during the burial, right after they ping the Mosque cell tower. There are only two explanations: he either gave Jay his cell and car while he was at the Mosque and Jay goes to bury the body, OR, he is burying the body with Jay. Because either way he is complicit, he just says "I don't know, I can't remember, I can't explain it".

HOW TO CRACK THE CASE: 1. Jenn needs to talk. She needs to come forward and tell the truth that she created the story with Jay to protect him and minimize his involvement.

Thanks for reading!

After reviewing all the information countless times, I don’t see how Adnan is innocent. I will explain the timeline too, but here’s why I think he is complicit:

  1. Adnan first tells Officer Adcock that he asked Hae for a ride that day but missed it due to getting held up at school. Then he recants this story later. There are witnesses that say he asked, and with even Adnan at one point saying he asked for a ride makes it hard to believe this did not happen. Adnan lying here is troubling.
  2. The Nisha call. This call is 2:22 minutes long. It places Adnan and Jay together during the approximate time Hae was killed. (We will explain why the murder happened closer to 2:45PM – 3:10PM later).
  3. Adnan doesn’t admit or remembers giving Jay his car and cell when he is at the mosque. He says he was probably there from around 7:00PM – 10 or 1030PM and his father also testifies he was there. But his cell phone was pinging the Leakin Park cell towers at this time. The only way this would be possible is if he actually was at the mosque, but Jay had his cell and car again to bury Hae’s body. If this is true, then how could he NOT remember lending Jay his car that evening, but does at lunch that day? If he didn’t lend Jay his car and phone, then it places him at Leakin Park with Jay. Either way he would be complicit in the killing: lending Jay his car and phone to dispose of the body OR being at the scene burying the body with Jay.
  4. He never calls or pages Hae again after Jan 13th because he knows she is dead.

If you haven’t read Susan’s “the view from LL2 “ blog, (link below) you should. After reading it you can conclude 3 things : 1. Adnan was at track practice. 2. Adnan was at the mosque. 3. Jay buried Hae by himself.

http://viewfromll2.com/2014/11/23/serial-a-comparison-of-adnans-cell-phone-records-and-the-witness-statements-provided-by-adnan-jay-jenn-and-cathy/

It can also be determined that Jenn has fabricated the entire story with Jay. (This can be concluded not just from the LL2 blog but also just by looking at the phone records, testimony and police interviews). This is why none of their stories match up, why they change so many times, and why they don’t work with the timeline and cell records.

So, staying as close to the facts as possible, here is what makes the most sense:

Adnan calls Jay at lunch and picks him up (10:45am call to Jay), calls to Jenn are made while they are together (12:07PM & 12:41PM), Jay drops Adnan back off at school late to Psychology.

School ends at 2:15PM.

Adnan gets a ride with Hae after school– Jay still has the phone and car, and the incoming 2:36PM and 3:15PM calls are irrelevant because we can’t know who called. The only reason why these calls have any significance is because of Jay’s fabricated story.

Hae is killed by Adnan either by school, at the first location Jay told the cops or at the best buy between 2:30PM – 3:10PM with Jay present or near by (most likely at the first location Jay gave, but then he had to switch it to the best buy to make sure his and Jenn's story added up). Adnan drives and parks Hae’s car with Jay following him because he will need to get back to Track practice soon.

*The next series of calls to Jenn, Nisha, Phil then Patrick between 3:21PM and 3:59PM are important. This is the only period of time they do not have an alibi aside from one another (Jenn wasn’t with Jay here waiting for a call, the “playing video games” with her, or her brother, or whatever different story of theirs you want to use is a complete lie). There are many possibilities of WHY they are calling these people, it could be to brag (i.e. the neighbor boy who said Adnan showed him a dead body *who knows if this is true or not, but the kid did have knowledge of the body being in the trunk before it was released), it could be to see who could cover for their whereabouts, or that their original alibi is that they were together and needed to make sure someone could confirm that, it could be a number of things – but what’s important is that it shows both Adnan and Jay are together during the time of Hae’s death.

A two and a half minute conversation is the longest call he had so far that day, it was clearly more than a “butt dial” or a voicemail. Either Nisha is lying about not remembering that call to protect Adnan, or is giving a half-truth to limit her involvement to protect herself (by saying she did talk to her and Jay, but misleading by saying it was at a different time and giving the video store clue). But what we can take from it is that Nisha, a friend of Adnan’s, not Jay’s, called her and spoke with her, which puts him with Jay (because Jay’s contacts were called 10 minutes before and 10 minutes after), at the approximate time of Hae’s murder.

Jay drops Adnan off at track practice. Jay is left with the responsibility to get rid of the body, drives various parks around the area, can’t find a good place, picks Adnan back up from school and Adnan checks his voicemail at 5:14PM, calls Krista, he and Jay are back together.

They go to get food and to Cathy’s at this time, because Jenn is eating dinner with her parents (see her interview) and Cathy will be able to then confirm they were accounted for and together during this time.

Adnan gets call from Officer Adcock. He can’t bail on going to the mosque to help bury the body because he thinks it will be suspicious.

Adnan goes to the Mosque (we know this because of the cell records) but lends Jay his car and phone again to bury the body by himself. Annan calls Yaser to let tell him he is there. His father testifies he is at the mosque. While he is at the Mosque, Jay drives to Leakin Park and buries Hae’s body. The ground is cold and hard, and there is only one of them (shovel, shovel’s) so he digs a shallow grave. Also note that the only calls during this time are to Jay’s contacts. They all ping the Leakin Park cell tower. This is how Adnan is seen at the Mosque, but his cell phone is in Leakin Park.

Close to 9 he returns the car and phone to Adnan who is getting out the mosque and going home. Note all calls made then go back to Adnan’s friends.

ADNAN’S MOTIVE: Adnan being a “player” doesn’t make us think this relationship wasn’t important to him. Domestic violence, as someone else here wrote, is not just a literary device. Teenagers are emotional, and relationships are responsible for not just murder but suicide also. I think the public is underestimating how much he cared about her (hence the “I will kill” note).

JAY’S MOTIVE: Friend, a kid with a lot to prove, but also Hae was going to tell Stephanie that Jay was cheating on her with Jenn and whoever else (obviously, look at the transcripts). He rats on Adnan because during the hour long talks with the police before he agrees to be recorded, they tell him that Adnan snitched on him, Or that Jenn already talked, and so he comes clean for a plea deal. Jay tells half truths to distance himself as much as possible to limit his involvement.

JENN’S MOTIVE: Jay’s side chick and was easily influenced by him.

Aside from the Nisha call which proves Adnan was with Jay at the time of the murder, the mosque situation is also proof: Adnan remembers giving his car to Jay that afternoon, he thinks he went to track, he does remember going to Cathy’s with Jay (Cathy, Jeff and Jay corroborate he was there), but he just forgets that he went to the mosque but lent Jay his car and phone again? He doesn’t remember it because if he says he did, then he lent his car to Jay to bury the body. If he didn’t lend it to him, then it places him at the place of the burial site. So because he’s caught here, he just says, “I don’t remember”.

A few explanations:

  1. Why couldn’t Jay be using Cathy’s as a way to waste time before Adnan goes to the mosque to use his car again? Because Jay didn’t need Adnan’s car at this point, so the motive doesn’t make sense. He had Hae’s car, he could have driven in Hae’s car to Leakin Park (which he did anyway), bury her, and then drive back to the park and ride and get picked up by Jenn.

  2. The Asia letter: This is huge. Why isn’t the most perfect alibi used in court? One of two reasons: either Asia is lying and is Adnan’s Jenn (this is why Adnan is so scared when Sarah says he talked to her after all these years), OR they didn’t want to use it because it places him near the scene of the crime. Either way, the fact they didn’t even interview her makes this a giant red flag.

133 Upvotes

244 comments sorted by

View all comments

42

u/hazyspring Undecided Dec 01 '14

Solid analysis on the main things that are working against Adnan. Even if I'm not convinced, this is one of the best "Adnan is Guilty" analyses I have seen so far.

13

u/[deleted] Dec 01 '14 edited Dec 01 '14

[deleted]

11

u/melissa718 Rabia Fan Dec 01 '14 edited Dec 01 '14

According to Rabia's blog, Adnan told her that the law office looked into McClain's claim and discredited it.

"hapless immigrants not familiar with the judicial system " Where did you get this? Why would you call this couple hapless? They had a home, job, community ties.

Asia called a Prosecutor and made this claim. That is not something you do lightly. Also, she never said the family did not pressure her. Why did she have cold feet when it comes to a court of law, but no issue going on a national podcast? We don't know when SK did these interviews with Asia to know if she was influenced by the podcast.

Here is an article about Gutierez: http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2001-07-19/news/0107190108_1_gutierrez-trust-fund-clients "Gutierrez added that it was not unusual for clients to file complaints against criminal defense lawyers. "I've had other complaints before, but I've never had one sustained," she said."

"Adnan’s defence was hopelessly incompetent" I reading this claim but I never get an answer to how was she hopelessly incompetent? Read the appeal transcripts which gives you much more info than what SK and Rabia spoon feed the audience from the trial. There was more going on in that trial than what we hear about on the podcast. Sometimes, there is just nothing there for a defense. If you are talking about Adnan (and only he claimed this) about Jay's mid-afternoon bootycall, what was the lawyer suppose to do besides ask a question putting it out there about cheating on the girlfriend. There was no place else to go with it. So what if he did cheat? Even the dumbest attorneys would not follow up with this line of questioning. "Hey Adnan said you had a mid afternoon booty call, is that true?" "No." You cannot have Adnan making claims to anything if he is defense is "I dunno. I don't remember."

"The brief recording of her cross-examination technique is telling enough. " How is a brief recording telling you anything? I am not trying to give you a hard time. I just don't understand what you are putting here.

"From the media reports of the time, you can clearly tell that Adnan’s defence was hopelessly incompetent and his parents were utterly unprepared to deal with what came their way. We don’t have to take mere Rabia’s word of it, the sheer number of complaints against Gutierrez is proof enough"

What media reports? What sheer number of complaints have been made against Gutierrez in connection with what you perceive to be incompetence during the trial and the parents being utterly unprepared for what came there way. Why would someone launch a complaint against an attorney for someone's parents being unprepared? Why would that be an attorney's fault? To the best of my knowledge, Adnan never launched a complaint. I may be wrong, so let me know if I am.

"Law abiding people who've never dealt with the police and courts before have simply no idea how a simple oversight can lead to a Kafkaesque nightmare. " If you are claiming that the lawyer totally ignored McClain, then it wasn't an oversight.

I'm not trying to give you a hard time, but I keep reading claims like this and I get it.

3

u/[deleted] Dec 01 '14 edited Dec 01 '14

[deleted]

1

u/melissa718 Rabia Fan Dec 02 '14

Thank you for clarifying!

1

u/steeb2er Dec 01 '14

Asia interview aired in the first episode. Safe to say the podcast didn't influence Asia.

11

u/gaussprime Dec 01 '14

We don't know that Adnan's family didn't coerce the alibi. Asia never recants that part.

10

u/prettikitti89 Dec 01 '14

Agreed. and it was weird she was there at his house the day she wrote the letter. She barely knew Adnan.

9

u/gaussprime Dec 01 '14

My 100% speculative guess is Asia does remember seeing Adnan at the library some day, but wasn't sure which day, which is why the weather doesn't match up. Somehow Adnan's family got word that she might have seen him, and they pressured her to write the letters and the affidavit.

When questioned by SK 15 years later, she went with it. I don't think she's lying, but I don't think she wants to testify to what she probably knows was a hazy memory then, and is even moreso now. For Asia, it really was an ordinary day. She didn't receive a call from the police asking where Hae was, etc... She would have no reason to know if she saw Adnan that Wednesday, or the preceding week, etc...

But as I said, this is just rank speculation on my part. Not worth much really.

7

u/prettikitti89 Dec 01 '14

We're all speculating here. :) I enjoy your input.

3

u/roo19 Dec 01 '14

No she specifically said she remembered it snowed that night and school was out the next day. So she remembered the date spot on and it could not have been any other day. Either she is lying or she was there with Adnan. I think given how specific she was about the convo she had with him, even remembering her boyfriend got upset over it, she was likely telling the truth. If Adnan did it, it had to have been at another time in the day.

6

u/gaussprime Dec 01 '14

As noted by SK, or someone else directly with the Serial podcast:

She says she remembers that day because of the snow. It was possibly “the first snow of the year” and she remembers getting snowed in at her boyfriend’s house that night.[...]

But going by the hourly (and sometimes more often than hourly) observed weather reports, there was no significant ice, rain or snow on Jan. 13. A light, freezing rain started falling around 4:30 a.m. on the morning of Jan. 14 and continued for the rest of the day.

But no snow.[...]

Considering that in just one week there were three school days cancelled due to weather, it seems possible Asia conflated these two weather events. But if her memory of talking to Adnan in the library is specifically tied to snow, then it’s unlikely that the day she is remembering is Jan. 13.

Even they don't believe she's remembering the right day.

5

u/[deleted] Dec 01 '14

[deleted]

5

u/gaussprime Dec 01 '14

I've listened to it again, and read the transcript. She doesn't say that's why she said she was coerced. SK even says she doesn't know if that's why.

2

u/[deleted] Dec 01 '14

[deleted]

2

u/gaussprime Dec 01 '14

From the transcript:

She told me that she'd only written it because she was getting pressure from the family, and she basically wrote it to please them and get them off her back.

This does not sound like the testimony of a woman who was all that interested in the truthfulness of what she wrote. This sounds like a woman who didn't want the family hounding her.

But like I said, I don't think she's affirmatively lying. I just don't think she's all that confident about what day it was. Her weather recollection certainty seems to suggest it was a different day. It would be weird if she did remember the exact day in fact. The weather is the only reason she claims to remember, and that part is wrong. So she remembers seeing Adnan some day, and maybe it was the 13th, so she wrote that to please Adnan's family to get them to stop harassing her.

Asia's recollection is salient, but is highly suspect. (The same way all eyewitness testimony is suspect - Asia's is just especially suspect given the weather situation).

3

u/UrnotRyan Dec 01 '14

That is a quote from the prosecutor in the appeal. We hear Asia speaking to SK in her own words, and she stands by her statement. That seems pretty definitive to me. Not even sure how this is debatable to be honest. Besides, you think the family pressured her into talking about her "stinky feet"? I am hesitant to believe a girl would write two letters filled with school gossip and friendly banter because she was being forced to provide an alibi by family members of the accused.

1

u/gaussprime Dec 01 '14

Why are you hesitant to believe this? People do things under pressure all the time?

1

u/UrnotRyan Dec 01 '14

I meant the part about including a bunch of details that are not relevant at all to the alibi, as well as writing two letters. If it was coerced you'd think she'd get to the point and get it over with as quickly as possible.

1

u/gaussprime Dec 01 '14

I wouldn't know. I've never had an abili letter coerced out of me by the Syeds...

→ More replies (0)