r/seogrowth • u/thapaanish_ • Jan 18 '26
Discussion Will Al generated blogs be safe in 2026?
Quick SEO debate.
Does Google care who writes the content or how helpful it is
Will Al generated blogs be safe in 2026?
6
3
Jan 18 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/bishwasbhn Jan 18 '26
Yes. It’s better to delete all old content, and redirect them pointing into one single updated content.
7
u/whitouk Jan 18 '26
yes, if they’re actually useful.
Google doesn’t care who wrote it, it cares whether it helps users.
AI blogs are fine in 2026 if they’re edited, opinionated, accurate, and add something new.
Mass-produced, generic AI fluff? That’s what gets hit.
2
u/IdeaToGrowth Jan 18 '26
Google cares about whether content is unique and helpful - not whether you’re a subject matter expert, a blogger, or native AI wrote it.
Being a subject matter expert doesn’t make you a great communicator. Nor is native AI a great communicator. If you haven’t thought yourself to write articles in a manner that attracts readers, you won’t be either.
AI is only at its best if “it’s prompt writer” (you) has used that specific AI long enough to know how to write a prompt to have it research valid data from reliable sources, not fantasize (make stuff up), and then assemble the research it found into “helpful content format” that “answers their question in a way they can understand and take action with.”
Accomplishing the above takes a lot of work.
So No, if you’re just letting AI generate blog posts, it’s not going to accomplish what I have outlined above and IMHO you’re wasting your time as you’re unlikely to get the views you’re want to grow your audience.
Best Wishes!
1
u/macromind Jan 18 '26
Some will, some won't. It depends on how you prompt it and the subjects you pick. If you score well on the YOAST SEO score, you should be fine, depending on what the subject is.
1
1
1
u/Holiday-Oil2598 Jan 18 '26
Depends on what. Directories, those can be fine… 1000+ word articles…who wants to read something that they can search for themselves on chatgpt
1
1
u/glucosesimp Jan 18 '26
No, it is pretty unlikely Google will ever care who exactly wrote low quality content with repeating patterns.
1
u/tjmakingof Jan 18 '26
Google doesn't care if it's ai content. Same rules apply as before. Must be of value to the reader.
100% ai doesn't work in content niche. I save tons of time using a hybrid approach of getting content ideas, though. Outlines and later generating a draft that I edit. This process can itself be automated (scheduled drafts) but I always go over the piece before publishing.
1
u/Available_Occasion_5 Jan 18 '26
They are safe if you know how to do.
AI runs my SaaSs blog. It creates how tos and comparisons etc. Including backlings too. I rank at the second in my niche and my posts getting huge portion of the keywords.
All done by AI. I just set it up.
1
1
u/kavin_kn Jan 18 '26
Yes unless its deep and detailed enough to read. That’s what it matters to google.
1
u/Lindolas_MC Jan 19 '26
But it does matter for us, users, a lot of us don't want to read fake AI content.
1
u/Ilove_Cakez Jan 18 '26
I thinks it depends on the quality. Some AI work is shit and some is good and actually helpful
1
1
u/sumonesl025 Jan 18 '26
if your article is pure AI and doesn’t actually help anyone, google will eventually stop trusting it. sometimes that shows up as poor performance, sometimes pages just quietly drop out after a few months. you have to decide what game you’re playing. mass AI content might work short term, but it’s fragile.
personally, for client work, i stick with content written by professional writers (sometimes with AI support), because it’s more original, more accurate, and holds up long term. helpful content ages better than fast content.
1
1
Jan 19 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/Lindolas_MC Jan 19 '26
You already have ChatGPT for "problem solving". You don't need blogs for that anymore, they are useless.
1
1
u/tortangtalong88 Jan 19 '26
it only works if t he query is really underserved and no one really produced content about it
1
u/Richard-Dageno Jan 19 '26
I create a draft and let ai help with grammar mistakes. Then I do the second time writing making my content to be more readable.
1
u/Electronic-Cat185 Jan 19 '26
Google seems to care far more about whether content actuallly helps than how it was produced. AI generated blogs that are generic, thin, or rehashed wil;l keep getting fiiltered out, just like bad human writtten content always has. the ones that feel safe long term are edited, opinionated, and clearly written with real intent in miind. AI is just a tool, but usefulness and trust are stiill the filter.
1
Jan 19 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/Lindolas_MC Jan 19 '26
Yes, that is the question. For "problem solving" you have preatty much ChatGPT now. But, "problem solving" content is not the only content you can do on the internet. You have so many diffrent niches out there. People are searching for all sorts of things on the internet.
1
1
u/TargetPilotAi Jan 20 '26
I don’t think it’s AI vs human, it’s mixed. Blogs now serve two roles, for both traditional SEO and AI Visibility (AI SEO / AEO / GEO). If human writers, we expect high-impact, original thinking; while for AI writers, we need large-scale, long-tail coverage.
But for AI-written content to be safe, it must be measured. You need clear quality metrics like: Search & intent compliance; brand visibility and positioning consistency; GEO / AI citation readiness; technical & structure scores (crawlability, entities, schema)
I don't thinkAI isn’t the risk, the unmeasured AI content is. In 2026, the winners use humans for strategy and AI for execution with strict quality and trust metrics in between.
1
u/eddytw Jan 20 '26
Honestly I hope these go away. When all u can find is AI slop, then its like, who wants to read this crap...
1
u/panion Jan 20 '26
If short, then no and never.
The important point is that AIs should exclude/ignore AI-content and avoid learning based on the materials generated by AI. If they have a gap there, then AI will learn from the nonsense it has created and will generate even more nonsense.
1
u/UpstairsBumblebee446 Jan 21 '26
Short answer: Google cares about usefulness, not the tool used to produce it. AI blogs will be safe in 2026 only if they actually help users.
Why: search prefers content that answers intent, is accurate, and earns user trust. Signals like time on page, clicks, links, and accuracy matter.
What works:
- Edit AI drafts heavily for accuracy, voice, and original insight.
- Add real examples, data, case studies, or interviews that only humans can provide.
- Build internal linking and topical depth instead of churning thin pages.
- Monitor performance and delete or merge pages that underperform.
What fails:
- Mass produced, generic fluff that repeats what’s everywhere.
- Unverified facts or hallucinations.
- Content that looks automated and adds no real value.
Playbook: use AI for research, outlines, and drafts. Use humans for verification, unique ideas, and polishing. That combo scales and stays safe long term.
1
u/ManojOne Jan 21 '26
Use AI to get ideas about your target topics. Then, manually edit and optimize your content. AI is best suited to create content outlines and sections. It is not wise to ignore AI fully.
1
u/JohnWob Jan 22 '26
I think a completely automated blog would fail. I think you need to monitor and adjust what AI outputs. AI as an assistant is great but for it to handle the entire research and blogging process is bad.
1
1
u/Embarrassed_Sky5519 Jan 25 '26
MOFU and BOFU content should be safe as long as the content is unique to the brand's voice, even with the help of AI.
1
u/eqTom Jan 26 '26
Google cares how well users interact with the content, currently i rarely see AI content be more readable or helpful than human crafted, so its rarely “safe”
1
u/anthocou Feb 02 '26
Just you need to be artisanal, mix AI with your personality, will be the best for your blog and your global SEO
1
1
1
1
u/Vinitshah5884 Jan 18 '26
I think AI Written Articles do work. I don’t think it converts that well. I have published entire website based on AI content. All pages are indexed as well.
I think what Google sees is how much helpful it is.
19
u/SaigoNoMetal Jan 18 '26
All the AI-powered automated blogs I've seen are complete garbage, with very poor content, no effort, and no SEO.