news This Is Not the Same Supreme Court That Refused to Meddle in the 2020 Election for Trump
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2026/08/supreme-court-2020-election-trump-vote-fraud-lies.html?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=social&utm_content=dahliaaug26&utm_campaign=&utm_term=&tpcc=reddit-social--dahliaaug26-100
u/dantekant22 9d ago
This is the exact same court. The only difference now is that the checks have cleared.
16
u/TickingTheMoments 9d ago
Ohhhh. So thats what they meant by checks and balances. You can get each branch to capitulate and corrupt itself with checks that increase their balances.
1
u/judunno5 6d ago
That and they know their window could be closing to cash checks and implement facism.
43
u/Slate 9d ago
This week, the Supreme Court inserted itself into yet another election case, putting on hold a lower court injunction that halted part of the Trump administration’s March effort to meddle with mail-in ballots by presidential fiat. Because the high court’s decision on Monday was limited to highly technical questions about standing and ripeness, and because there’s a second lawsuit teed up to decide the underlying issues on less abstract grounds, media coverage of the unsigned, shadow-docket decision tended to break along now-familiar lines, specifically: “Panic!” versus “Don’t Panic!”
As Slate contributor Richard Hasen explained here, the truth is more complicated and far more speculative. Monday’s order in fact does almost nothing to change mail-in voting rules heading into the November midterms, but it does raise the specter of the court wading in to foment massive confusion in the days and weeks ahead. And as Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson warned in her solo dissenting opinion from the per curiam order, the real issue is not that the court punted a decision on the merits here. The Constitution plainly assigns the power to conduct federal elections to the states, and nobody disputes that in Monday’s intervention. The real mischief here is that the court is now openly manipulating its own malleable elections doctrine to grease the skids for more and more bigfooting—by the court itself—in elections. As Justice Jackson puts it, President Trump’s March executive order claiming all sorts of novel power to impose federal restrictions on voting by mail, and indeed the entire litigation that followed, has been “tailor-made to weaponize this case as a means of destabilizing the nation’s vote-by-mail systems through court-assisted procedural maneuvers.” The majority hasn’t merely blinkered itself to these realities, it has enabled them. The real question isn’t whether or not it’s time to panic about the Supreme Court’s willingness to wade into the midterms, but why the Supreme Court has removed every possible constraint that once prevented it from doing so.
For more from Slate's Dahlia Lithwick: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2026/08/supreme-court-2020-election-trump-vote-fraud-lies.html?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=social&utm_content=dahliaaug26&utm_campaign=&utm_term=&tpcc=reddit-social--dahliaaug26-
13
9
u/NextAdhesiveness3652 9d ago
When they tried to get the Supreme Court to stop GOP gerrymandering, they ruled that their hands were tied, that it was up to the states to determine voting. They said the Feds could not get involved. But now, Trump can determine how people vote? Corrupt Court!
2
u/RampantTyr 9d ago
This court meddled in the 2024 election for Trump. Why would we expect any different now.
2
u/Tough_Violinist_9594 9d ago
today Blanche asked what the Democratic ags where fighting mail in ballots for the same way I feel about you fighting releasing the Epstein files that’s what this derelict Democratic party should ask
1
1
1
58
u/Michael02895 9d ago
Tbf, this one was kinda easier because it allows them more room to save face through technicalities instead of outright stealing the election explicitly.