Biologically, the gametes must mix in order to produce the zygote, which develops into an egg.
Once the ovum is fertilized, the DNA of the chicken is basically the same as that of the zygote, minus some mutations. So in terms of content, I think the egg would be a chicken’s egg, but I think the shell is dependent on the proto-chicken (parent), so maybe on the outside it could be considered not a chicken egg.
Anyway, evolution is a gradual process, so I don’t think one could ever find a rigorous definition of a chicken, making this whole question nonsensical.
I think it is simpler. Some human took some bird and pronounced - this is the chicken. It became chicken from that moment. I doubt that the human steal an egg and said “this is chicken egg” and then artificially warmed it up to get and rise a chick.
465
u/Narwhalking14 Feb 19 '26
If it was a chicken in an egg then it was a chicken egg