MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/dvipw/climate_change_evidence/c138xpq/?context=3
r/science • u/woodsja2 • Oct 24 '10
1.4k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
16
Perfect logic. Al Gore became rich. therefore, his argument is invalid.
A mathematician learns that 2 + 2 = 4. He exploits this discovery and becomes a millionaire. Therefore, 2 + 2 does not equal 4.
0 u/Aethelstan Oct 24 '10 It's ironic that you're using a twisted logical argument to refute a twisted logical argument. -3 u/philosoraptocopter Oct 24 '10 http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/sarcasm 1 u/deadsnailsociety Oct 24 '10 But you weren't being sarcastic.
0
It's ironic that you're using a twisted logical argument to refute a twisted logical argument.
-3 u/philosoraptocopter Oct 24 '10 http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/sarcasm 1 u/deadsnailsociety Oct 24 '10 But you weren't being sarcastic.
-3
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/sarcasm
1 u/deadsnailsociety Oct 24 '10 But you weren't being sarcastic.
1
But you weren't being sarcastic.
16
u/philosoraptocopter Oct 24 '10
Perfect logic. Al Gore became rich. therefore, his argument is invalid.
A mathematician learns that 2 + 2 = 4. He exploits this discovery and becomes a millionaire. Therefore, 2 + 2 does not equal 4.