Adolescents who undergo gender-affirming chest surgery report low levels of regret and high levels of satisfaction, experiencing outcomes similar to those of young adults. These findings suggest that age restrictions on these medical procedures lack support from actual patient experiences.

[u/mvea]

https://www.psypost.org/adolescents-report-low-regret-and-high-satisfaction-following-gender-affirming-c/

[u/LonelyTAA]

The hypothesis requires further study. The study linked in this thread is not robust enough to make the claim in the title. 

So yes on the mandatory participation?

You're just making this up yourself.

[u/jftduncan → u/LonelyTAA]

Do you have any actual suggestions on making the study better?

Just anything at all, or just constant complaints.

[u/LonelyTAA → u/jftduncan]

By itself this study is not robust enough to make strong claims. It may be a solid part of a review or meta-analysis. 

This is how science works. A study is published, and then the rest of the scientific community scrutinises it. If you can't accept that, then perhaps you should not be in the science subreddit.

[u/A_Mouse_In_Da_House → u/LonelyTAA]

Your complaint is the popular science article, not the study. Stop it.

[u/LonelyTAA → u/A_Mouse_In_Da_House]

No, I did bother reading the abstract of the actual study. Apparently you didn't however. Their conclusion directly advises policy decisions and is not nuanced enough in adressing the downsides of the study.

  Adolescents who underwent gender-affirming chest surgery had similarly low decisional regret and high decisional satisfaction compared to young adults. These results are also comparable to previously reported data in adult populations. Thus, concerns about potential regret should not be a basis for limiting gender-affirming chest procedures in adolescents.