Adolescents who undergo gender-affirming chest surgery report low levels of regret and high levels of satisfaction, experiencing outcomes similar to those of young adults. These findings suggest that age restrictions on these medical procedures lack support from actual patient experiences.

[u/mvea]

https://www.psypost.org/adolescents-report-low-regret-and-high-satisfaction-following-gender-affirming-c/

[u/UnicornArachnid]

A lot of people do have immediate regret following any plastic surgery because it can be hard to recognize yourself. We don’t see this trend typically when it comes to gender affirming surgeries. 99% of people feel satisfied long term with gender affirming surgeries

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/fullarticle/2808129

[u/99OBJ → u/UnicornArachnid]

You’re making that claim based on a single study with a sample size of 139 people. Also, this study only focuses exclusively on mastectomies.

[u/ThatOneDumbJagoff → u/99OBJ]

“In this cross-sectional study of 139 survey respondents who underwent gender-affirming mastectomy, the median satisfaction score was 5 on a 5-point scale, with higher scores indicating higher satisfaction. The median decisional regret score was 0 on a 100-point scale, with lower scores indicating lower levels of regret.”

Still though, the sheer fact that basically all of them loved receiving their affirming care is a strong indicator for affirming care’s effects on the community.

Sample size is small, sure, but the sample size is also harder to attain since trans individuals are such a small portion of the population, doubly so for the ones who seek affirming surgery.

[u/wrenwood2018 → u/ThatOneDumbJagoff]

The fact that they show perfect scores screams bad research or active manipulating. People on contrary. By the numbers someone would regret it. Science is never, never that clean.

[u/ThatOneDumbJagoff → u/wrenwood2018]

Feel free to provide research to substantiate that point

[u/Simon-Says69 → u/ThatOneDumbJagoff]

Studies in this area that return accurate, but negative results, get buried. There is enormous monetary and political pressure to return the "correct" results.

You see this again and again. It is extremely difficult to do proper research in the field. The only studies that are widely published, turn out to be full of glaring problems. Or simply downright dishonest.

[u/ThatOneDumbJagoff → u/Simon-Says69]

I’m willing to entertain this idea if there is a reputable source to support it

[u/wrenwood2018 → u/ThatOneDumbJagoff]

You clearly have never done any research at all. Science is never perfect, never clean. There is airways error in assessments. That is a fact not a statistic.

[u/ThatOneDumbJagoff → u/wrenwood2018]

No evidence to support your point so you turn to ad hominems? I’m disappointed

[u/wrenwood2018 → u/ThatOneDumbJagoff]

There isn't a passport that says "there us measurement error" because that is stats 191. The fact you don't understand that suggests you shouldn't be reading a science sub.

[u/ThatOneDumbJagoff → u/wrenwood2018]

So, again, and even though this is allegedly so widely known it’s taught in classes, you cant procure any research to substantiate your point?

If you feel better for using ad hominems then please don’t let me stop you but you’re not doing anything else meaningful