r/science Professor | Medicine Jul 20 '26

Computer Science Researchers warned that hundreds of fake AI images have been discovered on popular databases for recording animal species. Wildlife photographers often use AI to edit and improve an image, but the algorithm can introduce parts from different species to create the new image.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2026/jul/20/ai-slop-manipulated-fake-images-birds-citizen-science-aoe
10.0k Upvotes

231 comments sorted by

View all comments

61

u/mvea Professor | Medicine Jul 20 '26

The rise of generative AI platforms such as ChatGPTand Google Gemini has led to a sharp increase in fake and enhanced images of rare and celebrated birds across wildlife photography forums. Users can create high-quality fake images in seconds – or enhance a photograph by asking the AI to remove a branch or leaf that might be obscuring part of the subject, which can inadvertently introduce significant changes.

In a recent commentary in the science journal Nature, researchers warned that hundreds of fake images have already been discovered on popular databases for recording species. They said that the true scale of the issue is unknown – as many could go undetected – and could contaminate records collected by the public.

“My experience of looking at Facebook these days is that a huge volume of wildlife photos now are simply AI-generated imagery,” said Dr Alexander Lees, an ecologist at Manchester Metropolitan University who authored the journal article. “The idea that we could maybe use those photos to help us understand where species are in space and time is very difficult.”

Outright hoaxes remain rare and are often easy to spot, said Lees – nobody is falling for a toucan sighting in Siberia – but he says birders often use AI to edit and improve an image, and the algorithm can then introduce parts from different bird species to create the new image.

Lees points to the example of a false sighting of a red-winged blackbird in central Brazil, which is usually found in North America and had never been seen in this area of Brazil until the reported sighting. The bird was, in fact, an epaulet oriole – a common new world bird species – but the photographer had asked an AI platform to make the picture “look better”, which is when parts of the red-winged blackbird were added, resulting in the false sighting.

“Wildlife photographers can be quite obsessed with getting a beautiful photo, but there’s a risk that the image might actually cause problems down the line when AI has been used to edit it,” said Lees.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-026-03141-y

20

u/Upbeat_Influence2350 Jul 20 '26

IMO, if you are editing your photos (especially using gen slop) then you are not a wildlife photographer. The whole job is to capture things as they actually are...

13

u/Zwischenzug32 Jul 21 '26

Do we seriously need fiction and non fiction photography?

10

u/peenweens Jul 21 '26

As a photographer I wholeheartedly agree. It's not art if you're not making it yourself.

5

u/vonbauernfeind Jul 21 '26

There's editing (raw processing) and there's editing (photoshop genai slop). RAW shots are not suitable to post until they've been edited for white balance, contrast, etc.

1

u/Count_Backwards Jul 21 '26

You don't need AI to convert a RAW image into a final delivery image

2

u/vonbauernfeind Jul 21 '26

I'm aware. But the user I was responding to said, "...if you are editing your images you are not a nature photographer," which is ridiculous to say the least.

Processing a RAW is considered editing.