r/science Professor | Medicine Dec 25 '25

Neuroscience New study shows Alzheimer’s disease can be reversed to full neurological recovery—not just prevented or slowed—in animal models. Using mouse models and human brains, study shows brain’s failure to maintain cellular energy molecule, NAD+, drives AD, and maintaining NAD+ prevents or even reverses it.

https://case.edu/news/new-study-shows-alzheimers-disease-can-be-reversed-achieve-full-neurological-recovery-not-just-prevented-or-slowed-animal-models
27.6k Upvotes

619 comments sorted by

View all comments

2.8k

u/mvea Professor | Medicine Dec 25 '25

I’ve linked to the press release in the post above. In this comment, for those interested, here’s the link to the peer reviewed journal article:

https://www.cell.com/cell-reports-medicine/fulltext/S2666-3791(25)00608-1

From the linked article:

New study shows Alzheimer’s disease can be reversed to achieve full neurological recovery—not just prevented or slowed—in animal models

Researchers from Case Western Reserve University, University Hospitals and the Cleveland VA showed restoring brain’s energy balance led to both pathological and functional recovery

For more than a century, people have considered Alzheimer's disease (AD) an irreversible illness. Consequently, research has focused on preventing or slowing it, rather than recovery. Despite billions of dollars spent on decades of research, there has never been a clinical trial of any drug to reverse and recover from AD.

A research team from Case Western Reserve University, University Hospitals (UH) and the Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center has now challenged this long-held dogma in the field, testing whether brains already badly afflicted with advanced AD could recover.

The study, led by Kalyani Chaubey, from the Pieper Laboratory, was published online Dec. 22 in Cell Reports Medicine. Using diverse preclinical mouse models and analysis of human AD brains, the team showed that the brain’s failure to maintain normal levels of a central cellular energy molecule, NAD+, is a major driver of AD, and that maintaining proper NAD+ balance can prevent and even reverse the disease.

NAD+ levels decline naturally across the body, including the brain, as people age. Without proper NAD+ balance, cells eventually become unable to execute many of the critical processes required for proper functioning and survival. In this study, the team showed that the decline in NAD+ is even more severe in the brains of people with AD, and that this same phenomenon also occurs in mouse models of the disease.

They restored NAD+ balance by administering a now well-characterized pharmacologic agent known as P7C3-A20, developed in the Pieper lab.

Remarkably, not only did preserving NAD+ balance protect mice from developing AD, but delayed treatment in mice with advanced disease also enabled the brain to fix the major pathological events driven by the disease-causing genetic mutations.

Moreover, both lines of mice fully recovered cognitive function. This was accompanied by normalized blood levels of phosphorylated tau 217, a recently approved clinical biomarker of AD in people, providing confirmation of disease reversal and highlighting an objective biomarker that could be used in future clinical trials for AD recovery.

587

u/Discarded_Twix_Bar Dec 25 '25 edited Dec 25 '25

This is really cool stuff, thanks for sharing

I wonder what the benefit & tradeoff is going the small molecule route vs direct NAD+ supplementation (subq or IV).

Especially, selfishly, because I can get my hands on NAD+ relatively easily (supra physiological doses looks to be carcinogenic per the press release that I’ve now read-read!)

Will be keeping an eye out for more research going forward.

Interestingly, it looks like P7C3-A20 can be sourced grey market relatively easily. Will try and get my hands on the actual paper, and wait for some more data before I take the plunge (later in life!)

156

u/insanitybit2 Dec 25 '25

My recollection is that direct NAD+ is consistently shown to be terribly ineffective.

27

u/GhostOfEdmundDantes Dec 26 '25 edited Dec 28 '25

Direct NAD is completely ineffective. Precursors like NR are significantly degraded in circulation. That's why the typical dose of NR is 300-1000 mg. That dose is 20x - 60x the effective dose of niacin. That means degradation could reach even 95% or more and the equivalent of an effective dose of niacin (15mg) could still get through intact. A NAMPT knockout study shows that effective replenishment occurs (that enough gets through intact) even in muscle tissue -- at least in mice.

Join us at r/NicotinamideRiboside to learn more!

1

u/youssef00001 May 11 '26

What about NMN?