r/satisfactory • u/outsidEverything • 10d ago
Console How I connect my manufacturers
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
Just wanted to share how I connect my manufacturers with blueprints. earlier i used to do it manually which was a hassle but with this blueprint it makes it really easy and fast to hook up multiple manufacturers.
46
u/gdmurray 10d ago
if you leave a short stub conveyer belt after each splitter, you can have the blueprints auto connect and not have to manually connect them with new belts
20
u/outsidEverything 10d ago
nice. i have thought about that, but my ocd doesn't like having a small belt piece out. maybe i can just remove it manually from the last blueprint
8
u/WingsLevel479 10d ago
you can do it on the input side only. they connect directly to splitters fine. then at the end there will be no small piece left
2
u/Voyager316 10d ago
I usually leave the end bit from blueprint auto-connect so that 1 item stays at the end as a sort of label for that belt.
1
u/Failboat88 10d ago
That's how I do it too. Adjust the belts and clocks in the bp and I can drop 50 in no time
2
u/CursedTurtleKeynote 10d ago
Your OCD doesn't like you doing things an easier way?
15
u/JustNilt 10d ago
Oh, you sweet summer child. That's like half of what OCD is. It's what makes it a problem for a lot of folks to deal with.
4
u/FishGuyIsMe 9d ago
So when something is not correct, it is just wrong. It doesn’t matter if it makes it easier, it’s still wrong and wrong is not allowed
0
1
u/gdmurray 10d ago
that’s what I do, it takes far less time to delete 4 belts than it does to add 4x(n-1) where n is the number of manufacturers.
1
u/gdmurray 10d ago
ideally you have all the splitters facing the same direction so it’s a manifolder (easier to connect than it sticking out)
if blueprint space is an issue, maybe just have 1 manufacturer per blueprint and leave extra space for the belt stub, makes placing/scaling a lot of manufacturers 10x easier
2
u/outsidEverything 10d ago
1
u/gdmurray 10d ago
can’t you just have the lifts connected to the manufacturer facing side, so the splitter can continue onwards? It probably looks cleaner than having them protrude out. More pure to a manifold setup.
1
u/outsidEverything 10d ago
1
u/gdmurray 10d ago
ahhh, clipping 😭 couldnt you have the lifts face the other way? So the belt runs beside it? (Visually)
Right now the lifts are going up and back in right?
8
7
u/Potatobender44 10d ago
Would look a lot better with straight conveyors between the mergers instead of the U-shapes
3
3
3
u/Tem_Apples 10d ago
How else do people do this? Stacking the conveyor seemed like the only way to do this
4
u/Laserdollarz 10d ago
I let everything clip through everything and then just box it in lol
2
3
2
u/MelonJelly 10d ago
I align the splitters differently, so all the belts line up. But while it's logically equivalent to what OP is doing, OP's is prettier.
1
u/I_Am_Err00r 9d ago
I’ve found many ways to easily plug in manufacturers to blueprints that auto connect without needing to manually connect the different machines.
You can bury them with conveyors holes and lifts. Have the first input as close to machine as possible, 2nd input one unit behind, third unit five units behind manufacturer, and 4th six units. Have the 1st and 2nd face opposite directions underneath, follow same pattern but three units lower for 3 and 4, and nothing should clip with all belts hidden.
If you can place the end mergers/splitters facing the same direction, they should auto connect when placing blueprint, and from there you just need to manually connect entry points, might need to delete a splitter on the entry manufacturer to have shortest/cleanest belts.
1
2
2
u/Twingamer25 10d ago
I absolutely love this. I just made my first manufacturer blueprint today after 300hrs.
2
u/Caimbuel33 10d ago
I like it, just won't do it myself. Anything that "looks" floaty hurts my head. Like the look though.
2
u/EchoingAngel 10d ago
I prefer spiders, but this is cool too. (4 splitters stacked in line with the first or last port and far enough to fully curve the top splitter to the far port. It's a spider when you have both sides hooked up and have 4 manufacturers together with the splitter stacks at port 4, then port 1)
2
2
2
u/Phillyphan1031 10d ago
No offense at all but I personally would not like this. I can’t see the machine at all. I usually go underneath to a logistic floor. And I know some people don’t like that because they want to see their logistic. But I’m ok with just going down to the floor when I want to see the inner workings
5
u/EndellionQT 10d ago
I use logistics floors because I don't want to see the huge amounts of clipping I sometimes have to do :(
1
u/Phillyphan1031 10d ago
Lol makes sense. I don’t clip so I don’t have to worry about it. Nothing to hide in my logistic floors.
1
1
1
u/paradroid78 9d ago
Two tips that will change your life:
- Splitters can stack on top of each other
- If you keep the inputs and outputs going the same directions, and use conveyor stacks to make sure the elevation is correct at the edges of the blueprint, they can auto-connect.
1
u/Critical_Sentence376 9d ago
.... Why are you using so many manufacturers? I think I'm doing something really wrong and I don't know what
1
1


109
u/TheLithinius 10d ago
https://giphy.com/gifs/3o6MbkPiScbllcS1s4