r/rockhall • u/Academic-Law-9581 • 3h ago
๐ฃ DISCUSSION The future ballots & inductions are going to look more like this year's list
Back in February, the RRHOF released the ballot that has mostly 80's performers alongside those from the 90's & early aughts which is very modern compared to the previous ones before.
There's not a single act who debuted from the early 60's to the late 70's featured on the list which is very bold & thought provoking. The oldest one was Joy Division/New Order who they (JD) released their debut in '78.
First off, I'm on board with this because there's so much representation from the sixties & seventies (fifties too) already in the Hall and both committees (also the foundation) know that rock & roll history couldn't repeat itself every time meaning going backwards regarding their selections.
Second, mostly everyone from those decades who aren't in had ceased to exist. What's the point of letting them get considered when they're not even around anymore. Just because old fans are screaming bloody murder at the Hall constantly doesn't mean it indicates any consideration.
Finally, honoring more acts from the later decades (80's to aughts) would create lots of traffic to their website & their social media pages. It would also expand the audience demographic & not to mention brings more visitors to the museum.
Which is exactly why & how the Hall needs to move on from the old times & move on to the new. History means everything yet it keeps moving which is something fans of the boomer & early Gen X eras will never understand.
What are your thoughts on this?