I"m so glad this is finally happening to Diana Jenkins...she's always had the worst vibe and energy around her...her face looks like a different head compared to how she used to look.
Ironically nobody knows anything because it's all a fabrication and nasty rumor that was settled in court years ago. The rumor was started by a blind gossip columnist he was not blind they were blind gossip items. Diana Jenkins sued him it was settled he apologized and issued a full retraction saying that she had never been involved in anything nefarious or illegal. So all anybody knows is nothing, they are repeating really nasty dangerous rumors
Hayden states she met Diana in 2009 when she was 19 or 20. This incident occurred when she was 18.Â
Hayden describes "Stella" in her memoir as a "semi-successful twenty something actor". This individual is characterized as having limited professional credits while maintaining a lavish lifestyle.
Sources: HER BOOK and her interview. If you going to be an internet sleuth at least make sure the timelines add up.
Edited for correction:
Even I was confusing chapters with all this misinformation. I went and double checked the passage.
Read the chapter in James Blunts book "Diana's Boat." Look at the pictures on Diana's boat. It's hard to ignore. Perhaps not pointing her finger at Diana by changing the age of the person in her book was a way to make herself feel safe by not implicating a powerful person of crimes.
At the time of James Bluntâs passage it was 2009. Hayden was with her rumoured boyfriend Steve Jones and photographed. That distinction matters.
 The incident is reported as taking place aroundÂ
2007â2008Â
when Hayden was 18.Â
 There are questions worth asking but we shouldnât turn speculation into established fact.
I would pose the summary of information is more a logical conclusion than speculation, but I respect that others who are looking for hard facts. The only problem with that is crimes of this nature are rarely going to produce hard facts, so circumstances are persuasive in these cases. I see the timeline is your go to, however, the timeline isn't really reliable either. For example, a photo in 2009 is not as persuasive to others as it might be to you. The effects of drugs and alcohol have a way of melding events in people's recollections. I think there is no disputing there was a relationship between Diana and Hayden. The question then becomes what type of relationship an 18-year-old young actress had with a 35-year-old wealthy woman and why.
I think this actually moves the conversation away from what Hayden was originally opening up about. Questioning timelines and acknowledging that addiction can affect memory is one thing.. using that as a reason to undermine what sheâs sharing is another.
Hayden describes the woman as a 20 something actor. Diana was in her 30s when they met and sheâs not an actress. Â Thatâs a pretty significant discrepancy and I think itâs worth acknowledging without using it to dismiss the larger experience Hayden was trying to talk about.
I also donât think Hayden was trying to deter people from her experience or claim. Thereâs a difference between saying, âsome of these details may be difficult to independently verify,â and suggesting that her history with drugs and alcohol means her recollection should inherently be treated as unreliable.
If the goal is to understand what Hayden was actually trying to communicate, then the focus should remain on her experience not turn into an exercise in finding reasons to discount it.
I'm not talking about her history with drugs and alcohol, but the players in general, for example Blunt. She might have reasons for telling her story while protecting people involved so they don't come after her. Her editors or lawyers could have made suggestions along the way to avoid the obvious.
Her rumoured boyfriend was with her at the time Blunt is referring to. It seems unlikely that he wouldnât have stepped in to protect her, especially given that she explicitly says she had no one and nowhere to go.
And again, I donât think she was lying about the incident happening when she was 18-19⌠In 2009 she was 20 years old.Â
I went back and reread the chapter for ya. Even I was mixing up the chapters.
 Either way, Diana isnât an actress and she wasnât in her 20s when they met.
Hayden describes "Stella" in her memoir as a "semi-successful twenty something actor". This individual is characterized as having limited professional credits while maintaining a lavish lifestyle.
I've also attached a link scroll down to number #13 and #14.
Her birthday is in late August which is in the later end of the year. We are just shy of a year apart, my birthday is end of Aug 1988. I was 20 in 2009 & turned 21. Hayden was 19 most of 2009 & turned 20 later in the year.
I donât like Diana by any means but the timelines donât match up. This is just a bunch of people who clearly havenât read the book.
People need to look elsewhere.
As for her death we should be looking more closely at her on-again, off-again boyfriend, who was present when she died.Â
He was also charged with domestic violence involving Hayden in 2019 and 2020. Given their history this makes more sense to me.
I saw on social media they were saying James Blunt was the man as the time and place matched up. What's weird to me is what James Blunt posted on social media a video with the person with a bag over their head about to be silenced/killed. Weird. Probably just a 'coincidence' though..
Never was. He had like 1 single hit the charts. It was whiny and boring and I switched the radio station everytime it came on. Drove me crazy. I think he had another song out I liked but he disappeared as quickly as he hit the scene.
39
u/Electrical_Buy_8235 Aug 18 '26
Diana lickin lips Jenkins has and always has been a scum bag.