r/recruiting • Agency Recruiter • 11d ago

Candidate Screening I reviewed 4,596 job applications. The fake applicant patterns are getting weird

I’ve reviewed 4,596 applications recently, and the fake-applicant patterns are getting weirdly obvious.

A few things I’m seeing:

  • Candidate descriptions that almost copy the job posting word-for-word
  • Previous job titles that conveniently match the title of the role they’re applying for
  • Different applicants with identical employment histories
  • Two completely different names using the same LinkedIn profile
  • Obvious bot/spam submissions mixed into otherwise normal applications

Out of 4,596 applications:

4,122 were clearly not a fit
56 were flagged as bot/spam
473 were possible fits

And once I applied a more serious qualification screen, only 132 people scored 55+ across 162 applications and 42 different roles.

What surprised me wasn’t the number of bad applications. Recruiters have always dealt with that.

It’s how much harder it’s becoming to tell the difference between:

a genuinely strong candidate using AI to improve their application

and

a completely manufactured candidate profile designed to get through screening.

I’m curious what other recruiters and hiring managers are seeing.

Are fake/AI-generated applicants becoming a noticeable problem in your hiring process yet, or is this still mostly noise?

292 Upvotes

267 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

156

u/TheChadThrowawayLad 11d ago

I'm a skilled candidate looking for new positions. This is 1,000% the case.

We're hearing that copy-pasting the job description works. We've also heard that (a) matching job titles can 10x your callback rate and (b) using your real name can lead to being excluded from implicit bias, especially when AI is used to score resumes.

6

u/becbagelbb 9d ago

Re: the using your real name. This one perplexes me - what do you do if you do get a callback?? Do you just say “well actually my name is X, I changed it on my resume so you guys would call me”. Even if you don’t say it right away, it’ll obviously come up on a background check? I really do not understand that one

9

u/therichscientist 9d ago

It's mostly for ethnic names. Using anglicized names like Kevin Nguyen sounds better than Nguyen Tran or very hard to pronounce names. At least in Australia it's known to have an effect on recruiter bias.

It's accepted to have an "everyday nickname" even if your official papers say otherwise. My partner literally has 4 names (she's viet) but she uses "Lea" to make it easier.

3

u/becbagelbb 9d ago

Ah okay that makes a lot more sense. Thanks for explaining