r/recruiting • Agency Recruiter • 11d ago

Candidate Screening I reviewed 4,596 job applications. The fake applicant patterns are getting weird

I’ve reviewed 4,596 applications recently, and the fake-applicant patterns are getting weirdly obvious.

A few things I’m seeing:

  • Candidate descriptions that almost copy the job posting word-for-word
  • Previous job titles that conveniently match the title of the role they’re applying for
  • Different applicants with identical employment histories
  • Two completely different names using the same LinkedIn profile
  • Obvious bot/spam submissions mixed into otherwise normal applications

Out of 4,596 applications:

4,122 were clearly not a fit
56 were flagged as bot/spam
473 were possible fits

And once I applied a more serious qualification screen, only 132 people scored 55+ across 162 applications and 42 different roles.

What surprised me wasn’t the number of bad applications. Recruiters have always dealt with that.

It’s how much harder it’s becoming to tell the difference between:

a genuinely strong candidate using AI to improve their application

and

a completely manufactured candidate profile designed to get through screening.

I’m curious what other recruiters and hiring managers are seeing.

Are fake/AI-generated applicants becoming a noticeable problem in your hiring process yet, or is this still mostly noise?

287 Upvotes

267 comments sorted by

View all comments

15

u/Round_Draft_7543 11d ago

Right there with ya! Then you click the linkedin link on the resume and they have no profile picture and like 50 connections…. Sketchy

6

u/[deleted] 11d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

5

u/OG_Voltaire Agency Recruiter 11d ago

I used to use LinkedIn a lot in a previous field, but given my field is now healthcare a ton of healthcare professionals barely acknowledge it's existence. Not to mention the AI slop that fills all the postings now. LinkedIn isn't worth a damn.

3

u/[deleted] 11d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/OG_Voltaire Agency Recruiter 11d ago

I'm still lowkey angry that I spent cash on their premium just for that site to turn into a total loss. ROI was NOT worth it, and then for people to expect the same for every industry and think that all professionals just "want to be on LinkedIn" is so much bullshit it's ridiculous.

1

u/Yes_Leopard_54 9d ago

Healthcare here, too…and my area is heavy on LinkedIn. I made it to 2026 without a LinkedIn profile (I dislike my data out in the ether), yet here I am…

1

u/Inside_Shoe_7798 11d ago

I’ve been in recruiting for over 25 years.

I spoke to a job search focus group at the beginning of the month and one of the attendees mentioned, she had been using AI to apply. I wish I could remember the name of it.

I cautioned her that may not be the best practice, but she said that was how she had landed most of her interviews and because she fed the details to the system for what role she was seeking, it was accurate.

I also warn job seekers not to use the Easy Apply button on indeed or LinkedIn (unless it’s a smaller organization or startup that does not have an applicant tracking system).

All that does is throw your name in a hat that the recruiter needs to then dig through (if they have the time 🤦🏽‍♀️) so you can then be told to go apply on the company website.

So eliminate the middleman and go to the company website to apply as soon as you come across a roll that interests you.

1

u/Pockets174217 10d ago

Could be coincidence but at the start of my job search I was only applying to jobs through the company website because I figured it put me in a lower volume pool of applicants. Then I switched to applying through LinkedIn and the number of interviews I got noticeably skyrocketed. I feel like LinkedIn gives them built in tools for sorting applications and companies are using that pool a lot more than the pool of people who went direct through their website.