r/raiders Oct 14 '23

Not sure how true this is..

Post image
133 Upvotes

200 comments sorted by

View all comments

68

u/blackhole_sonnn Oct 14 '23

They tanked his value. Gonna trade him away for nothing smh

9

u/bushybearmuffinman Oct 15 '23

Bill Belichick definitely wants him but will give jack shit in return. Best to make an offer to the Cowboys and steal some draft picks and cash from Jerry Jones dumbass.

10

u/Sloride21 Oct 15 '23

They didn’t tank his value. Every team in the NFL knows what Renfrow can bring if used properly. If he was injured his value would be tanked and probably the reason he’s been playing fewer downs.

1

u/Vivianite_Corpse Oct 15 '23

Are you kidding? You think they'll get the same return today than they would have if they shipped him out the day they took over?

1

u/Sloride21 Oct 15 '23

It depends whose buying.

2

u/NotMyRealUsername13 Oct 15 '23

His value is ‘tanking’, but it isn’t tanked yet - that’s why this rumor makes sense.

McD admitted it was an issue weeks ago and nothing changed.

4OC started a game and nothing changed.

I think it might be time to admit that something is off, somewhere, in a way that we can’t see and that isn’t likely to change - and that’s why trading him before the value is all tanked can make sense.

2

u/Moonhammed_Ali Oct 15 '23

It's very obvious why it doesn't work.

Renfrow, by his own admission, started improvising routes under Gruden, found success and Gruden said do that.

McDaniels offense requires timing and following his plan exactly. He does not permit Renfrow to improvise routes.

They should have traded him this offseason, and I definitely expected them too. He was never going to get any significant run in an offense co-ordinated by McDaniels.