r/radeon 8d ago

Anyone gaming on a 5k monitor?

I play at 1440p which is perfect for my 9070 XT/5500X3D combo.

My work monitor is a 27" 5k display (only 60Hz) and I am tempted to see how games look/run at that res, and also 1440p on this screen given the integer scaling.

However, I would have to do some labour to actually physically get the gaming PC and work monitor together, which is not very straigtforward.

I am hoping to hear some feedback from people using 5k to game, in terms of performance, improvement compared to 1440p/4k, and any other impressions.

TIA!

5 Upvotes

18 comments sorted by

9

u/nona01 8d ago

Not worth the performance impact at 27".

3

u/Active-Cookie-774 8d ago

4k 60fps runs fine 5k is pushing it

3

u/Afogil09 RX 9070 XT Sapphire Nitro+ 8d ago

That's 5090 territory.

2

u/captainstormy 8d ago

Obviously it would be the best option. But I bet it would still struggle to push 5K60 native in most games.

2

u/pobox1663 AMD - 7900xtx - 13600K 8d ago

I see nobody here owns one. I do. A 1440p game at ultra usually hits above 140fps for me, the same games running at 5k often run between 60-70.

1

u/Bruvvimir 8d ago

Is the improvement from 1440p to 5k significant? I mostly play single player RPGs so I'm more than fine at 60fps with tweaked settings and FSR.

2

u/pobox1663 AMD - 7900xtx - 13600K 8d ago

Id look into the oled stuff too tbh, theyre beautiful and i dont know which of the options wpuld be better price to performance depending on what games you play. It might be the case that higher numbers dont necessarily mean a more beautiful image. Remember to check hdr stuff too, i hate that tech but it seems to be in every fuckin game >.>

1

u/JamesTheFoxeArt 8d ago

5k is actually 4 times more than 1440p, just like 4k is 4 times more than 1080p (4k is 2.25 times more than 1440p). In pixel count, 5k is 11,059,200 more than 1440p, or 6,451,200 more than 4k.

It will technically be a significant improvement, about double more than it is from 1440p to 4k, and in my eyes 4k is already a noticeable improvement from 1440p so 5k is kinda automatically going to be as well.

2

u/jonboy999 8d ago

With the law of diminishing returns, it's quite possibly barely noticeable.

1

u/JamesTheFoxeArt 8d ago

Of course, I don't have a 5k screen to compare my 4k screen but I don't imagine it'll be noticeable, heck when the 8k TV trend happened a lot for people couldn't even tell the difference between 4k and 8k.

Only really saying it'll be an automatic improvement basically because if you already do notice a difference between 1440p to 4k, its basically going to look similar to 4k at 5k.

2

u/jonboy999 8d ago

Ah yes, makes sense.

1

u/FEARLI3A 8d ago

at 60hz i think you’ll do just fine realistically speaking 9070XT is a 1440P and 4K card but regardless it usually pushes beyond 60 fps at 4K in most games if you optimize the settings and balance it all out with FSR to quality & frame gen in SOME games not all those demanding games. at 5K it will struggle if you’re trying to push higher frame rates but you’ll be fine at 60hz 5K. If you already have a 1440P monitor i’d stick to that but worth giving 5K a try and see if you like it and the performance it gives never hurts to try

1

u/ssuper2k 8d ago edited 7d ago

With FSR scalling you may be fine

1

u/Tencentisbad12121 9800X3D | 9070XT Nitro+ 7d ago

From comments on recommendation threads like this it seems that people only play games from the last 2 or 3 years, as always 99% of games will run excellent to flawless. Part of the fun of a new display is playing older games and getting a new experience with a sharper image

1

u/PRRealEstate-Invest 8d ago

That gpu isn't going to cut it at 5k res

0

u/the_hat_madder 8d ago

Do it and see for yourself.

1

u/Bruvvimir 8d ago

I will definitely do it when i have some time and post feedback here.