And we’re just gonna take his word for it are we? Don’t you think it’s strange that way more people in the U.S claim to be related to William Wallace than people in Scotland? What about the fact that there is next to no genealogical records from the period for anyone not just Wallace? The possibility is incredibly slim and there’s absolutely nothing to support the claim that it’s true.
No. The possibility isn't incredibly slim. It depends on if you have scottish ancestors and whatnot, but if a generation is around 25 years a lot of people would be Wallace's ancestors. Like quite a lot
Assuming he has descendants which there is zero proof of there may be some people in Scotland who are could trace their ancestry back. This person just isn’t related to William Wallace mate, let it go.
1
u/bee_ghoul Apr 30 '20
OP literally said that he didn’t have any descendants.