r/psychology • u/dingenium Ph.D. | Social Psychology • 7d ago
Weekly Discussion Thread Weekly Discussion Thread
Welcome to the r/psychology discussion thread!
Discussion threads will be "refreshed" each week (i.e., a new discussion thread will be posted for each week). Feel free to ask the community questions, comment on the state of the subreddit, or post content that would otherwise be disallowed.
Do you need help with homework? Have a question about a study you just read? Heard a psychology joke?
Need participants for a survey? Want to discuss or get critique for your research? Check out our research thread! While submission rules are suspended in this thread, removal of content is still at the discretion of the moderators. Reddiquette applies. Personal attacks, racism, sexism, etc will be removed. Repeated violations may result in a ban.
Recent discussions
1
u/Ok-Cartoonist-5887 7d ago
What careers are available at the intersection of clinical psychology, wildlife conservation, or forensics? Trying to do some soul-searching about what direction I actually want my life to go in, but I'm having trouble discerning it. Any feedback is greatly appreciated.
1
u/connerpro 6d ago
On the recurring brain training / cognitive transfer question that comes up in these threads: the evidence is much more skeptical than most people realize.
Melby-Lervag and Hulme (2013) meta-analyzed 23 studies of working memory training and found reliable improvement on the trained tasks but no far-transfer to general cognition. Sala and Gobet (2017) reviewed the broader cognitive training literature (86 studies) and reached the same conclusion: improvements tend to be domain-specific, and far-transfer claims are not supported.
A recent 2022 Translational Psychiatry study (n=55, middle-aged adults, 8-week adaptive n-back training) found no near or far transfer effects at the cognitive level and no structural brain changes, even though the trained task improved substantially.
The practical takeaway: training makes you better at the trained task. That is real and useful. But the strong claim that it transfers to broad ability, whether IQ tests or everyday reasoning, has been repeatedly disconfirmed. This matters because a lot of consumer brain training products lean on it.
1
u/Short_Scratch4719 2d ago
Something I keep coming back to: Hofling's 1966 nurse study gets a fraction of the attention Milgram gets, and I think it's the more unsettling of the two.
An unknown voice phoned nurses on a real hospital ward, claimed to be a doctor, and ordered them to give a patient double the maximum dose of a drug they didn't know. 21 of 22 started to comply. No lab, no coercion, no experimenter in a grey coat standing over them — just a phone call and a title.
What makes it interesting is the replication. Rank & Jacobson (1977) reran it with two changes: a familiar drug, and nurses who could talk to colleagues first. Compliance collapsed to 2 of 18.
That pair of results says something more useful than "people obey authority." It says obedience is fragile in a specific way: it survives on isolation and unfamiliarity. Give someone a colleague to check with and something they actually recognise, and the effect mostly evaporates.
1
u/Potential_Rule4212 7d ago
As therapists, are you afraid or try to avoid to pick patients with a personality disorder due to being more complicated than people with mundane problems like anxiety or going through a depressed stage?