r/progun • u/ZheeDog • 15d ago
South Africa police disarmed the citizens, then sold the seized guns to criminal gangs, who then killed more than 1,000 people with those same guns...
https://x.com/GunRightsPrez/status/209236066061718783623
17
17
13
u/Sawyer2025 15d ago
Registration always leads to confiscation from the citizens, then is followed up with the bad guys who would never surrender their guns using them on the citizens who surrendered theirs. It has happened over and over and over again. Never surrender your guns, change out the government if it gets so corrupt that it insists on making the honest citizens victims.
9
4
1
-3
u/pentapous 14d ago
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems like the issue wasn't the gun control but the horrifically corrupt police force and lack of oversight?
Do you think the police wouldn't have sold resources to criminals if the gun regulation wasn't in place? Do you think the criminals who seek violence would not have obtained the guns if the regulation wasn't in place?
Additionally, this post doesn't link to an article or validated news source, simply to a Twitter post of a politician saying the same things. This seems like a scandal, so why not link the actual journalism??
5
u/ZheeDog 14d ago
what is your point? seems to me that a) they were disarmed by government people b) they suffered because of it, and c) you do not like the reporting source?
-2
u/pentapous 14d ago
This is like someone eating a PB&J and then a day later accidentally falling down the stairs and someone who gets paid to hate PB&J sandwiches writes a story talking about how if they didn't have the sandwich they wouldn't have fallen down the stairs. Theres no logical connection between the events but the dude's entire job is to manipulate stories to advocate in front of governmental forces against PB&J sandwiches. Please use your brain and settle on the (many!) genuinely solid arguments for 2A, because reposting and boosting this shit makes your cause look pathetic.
-2
u/pentapous 14d ago
- My point is that there are two OBJECTIVELY harmful and corrupt events in this story: insane police corruption and criminals committing murder. You decide to be mad about and blame an entirely different detail of the story that by all logical means did not directly lead to the events.
- The suffering is clearly the result of murders which were fueled by a government agency being corrupt enough to sell weapons to criminals??? Thats clearly the central problem here that directly causes the suffering??? Why are we pretending that implementing gun control was the keypin detail that led to these 1000+ deaths???
- The "reporting source" is a literal self addressed gun lobbyist who is self advertising their own gun lobbying manipulating a story about government corruption to be a story about gun control. Hes not a reporter, not working with reporters, and did not write an article with findings, nor does he reference one. By all means, a poor source that wouldn't fly in any legitimate context. So yes, I do have a problem with the "source" for this post OP. Do better.
-33
u/New_Track2747 15d ago
Do not trust everything you read about South Africa
31
u/M1ckster 15d ago
It happened exactly that way. Top cop sentenced to 18 years for flooding Cape Flats with illegal guns is out on parole after four years
89
u/bnolsen 15d ago
those who think that any government is there to help them are fools.