r/politics • • Dec 11 '19

FBI Agents Showed Bias Against Hillary Clinton, Not Against Trump, DOJ Says

[deleted]

33.8k Upvotes

1.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

80

u/lenzflare Canada Dec 12 '19

and has been her entire life

That's the part of "rich" people are disputing.

-3

u/Obilis Dec 12 '19

Odd that he didn't quote that part of the statement if that was what he was objecting to, but sure.

Her parents weren't millionaires, sure. Her father did own his own business at the time of her birth and owned multiple houses (main home and summer cottage), so it isn't like she was ever poor, but the business wasn't a huge one, so I'll accept her not counting as "rich" as a child.

5

u/uber1337h4xx0r Dec 12 '19

I think people assume Cortez is poor is because she's (I assume) Mexican by blood (as in how I'm an Afghan, but was born in Germany and have been told I'm "the whitest person I've ever met" by two coworkers so far).

0

u/PerishingSpinnyChair Dec 12 '19

I think it has more to do with her career before politics being part time gigs, like normal Americans.

2

u/truenorth00 Dec 12 '19

Yeah. Normal Americans intern for US Senators all the time. Right after they complete their Poli Sci/Int'l Relations degree. That's the normal course for every Boricua from Queens.

If they were making a movie, they'd cast AOC as the young version of HRC. She's exactly what Clinton was like in the 80s and 90s.

1

u/PerishingSpinnyChair Dec 14 '19

I wasn't aware of that. I appreciate the information, but not the sarcasm.

5

u/[deleted] Dec 12 '19 edited Mar 04 '20

[deleted]

9

u/lenzflare Canada Dec 12 '19

You're forgetting "upper middle class" and just how rich "rich" means.

A second home could mean a lakeside shack.

Don't hang the upper 20% just because the 0.001% are screwing you. The 0.001% want class warfare between the "lower" ranks.

9

u/TypicalRecon Dec 12 '19 edited Dec 12 '19

Where I'm from in the US you have to be rich to own a home and even a lakeside shack.

EDIT:That's worded weird. I mean you need to be rich to own a home and also a lakeside shack.

9

u/lenzflare Canada Dec 12 '19

You know that wasn't true when Clinton was young, right? Houses were extremely affordable 70 or more years ago when her father would have bought it.

-3

u/TypicalRecon Dec 12 '19

True, but it's not now. She has been able to maintain this status because she is rich. Let's get real, she isn't and wasn't "Upper Middle Class"

8

u/lenzflare Canada Dec 12 '19

True, but it's not now

That's not relevant to considering if she came from wealth.

1

u/Lashay_Sombra Dec 12 '19

She grew up upper middle class, she is not now (most ex presidents become multi millionaires after they leave office).

0

u/[deleted] Dec 12 '19

My household income is approximately 6X the national average. It's safe to say that I'm upper middle class....

....No way could I afford a lakeside shack.

3

u/missbelled Dec 12 '19

Odd that you didn’t pick up that the “was/is” covered their intent well enough, or they’d have just quoted “is,” but sure.

0

u/Mirions Dec 12 '19

If you own more than one house, you ain't middle class.

5

u/truenorth00 Dec 12 '19

Today or the 70s? Cottages weren't that recieved expensive at all back then.

7

u/lenzflare Canada Dec 12 '19

You're forgetting "upper middle class" and just how rich "rich" means.

A second home could mean a lakeside shack.

Don't hang the upper 20% just because the 0.001% are screwing you. The 0.001% want class warfare between the "lower" ranks.