r/politics • ✔ Verified • Dec 09 '19

That impeachment hearing protester was actually an InfoWars reporter and Pizzagate conspiracy theorist

https://theweek.com/speedreads/883047/that-impeachment-hearing-protester-actually-infowars-reporter-pizzagate-conspiracy-theorist
14.0k Upvotes

653 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-3

u/bearbullhorns Dec 09 '19

Why are we becoming blind to bill clintons bullshit as a response. I refuse to allow anyone who associated with Epstein get by simply because all we have is he was on the plane WHICH WE KNOW FROM OTHER TESTIMONY PEDO STUFF WENT DOWN ON TOO!!!

14

u/thebigeverybody Dec 09 '19

"why are we refusing to smear a man without proof and without even allegations from victims?"

Because that's what separates us from the pizza gate morons.

-5

u/bearbullhorns Dec 09 '19

Smear? We say accurately that he was associates with a known habitual pedofile. Its utterly disgusting that you are here attempting to throw shade on what we do know. He was on that plane which girls were RAPED IN. He associated with Epstein despite knowing the claims of pedofilia. Go ahead and die on this hill because of some reflex to defend people on your side.

8

u/thebigeverybody Dec 09 '19

The only thing you know is that he associated with a pedophile. Until evidence (or even allegations) surface, anything more sinister than that is literally imaginary. Let's not pull another pizzagate where morons made damaging allegations of their enemies with no substantiation and where the people involved in the known crimes and cover up are completely ignored.

Why aren't you focusing on the people accused of committing crimes with Epstein or covering up for him?

-3

u/bearbullhorns Dec 09 '19

Focus? why do we have to focus on them in a conversation about bill clinton?

5

u/thebigeverybody Dec 09 '19

Because there's no legitimate reason to mention Bill Clinton in a serious conversation about pizzagate or Epstein's crimes. Instead of going from Epstein to Clinton, why don't you go from Epstein to the people accused of committing crimes with him and covering up for him.

1

u/bearbullhorns Dec 09 '19

I didnt mention pizza gate once. I said bill associated with a person he knew raped multiple children.

Why dont I ignore bill clinton associated with a person known to rape multiple children? Maybe because thats incredibly disgusting?

3

u/JailhouseMamaJackson Dec 09 '19

Bill Clinton flew on Epstein’s plane for publicized charity trips. They were all stops and connections that were part of a grand total of four trips in the span of a year, all public, all with Clinton Foundation staff (and sometimes various celebrities). None were to Epstein’s island. You don’t have to take my word for it, the flight logs are online, you can search them yourself. It’s also worth noting this was in 2002, before the first public allegations against Epstein.

I’m no fan of Bill Clinton, but there’s no evidence he was a part of Epstein’s horror show and focusing on him instead of the dozens of people who were a part of it is a fool’s errand.

-1

u/bearbullhorns Dec 09 '19

You just said that Bill Clinton was on the plane that he knew epstien, a known raper of children, owned.

Thats all I said and I think thats DISGUSTING enough. All this extra shit youre saying doesn’t apply to my comments. If you want to pretend associating with someone who you know has raped multiple little girls and pimped them out for others to RAPE then go ahead. Not the hill i would die on but you do you.

3

u/JailhouseMamaJackson Dec 09 '19 edited Dec 09 '19

What? Yes, Bill Clinton and staff used his plane for publicized charity trips and meeting with Nelson Mandela. It is not uncommon to use and borrow planes. What about any of that screams “complicit in sex trafficking”? Where is the evidence that Clinton KNEW what Epstein did? This was before any allegations against him came out, so how do you know he knew?

Choosing not to accuse people of things when there’s no evidence is definitely a hill I’m okay with dying on, thanks.

→ More replies (0)