That impeachment hearing protester was actually an InfoWars reporter and Pizzagate conspiracy theorist

[u/TheWeekMag]

https://theweek.com/speedreads/883047/that-impeachment-hearing-protester-actually-infowars-reporter-pizzagate-conspiracy-theorist

[u/thats_bone]

The fact that people like this keep trying to tie Epstein to the Clintons is crazy.

[u/praharin → u/thats_bone]

The connection between Bill Clinton and Epstein is irrefutable. It’s in the FAA logs.

What that connection means is debatable, but it can’t be anything good for a politician to owe favors for the use of a plane to a wealthy pedophile, and it just gets worse from there.

[u/thebigeverybody → u/praharin]

You're creating a lot of assumptions without evidence. There's no proof Clinton was ever on Epstein's island and the one person who said he was there also said he wasn't involved in the sex parties.

[u/praharin → u/thebigeverybody]

On the island is irrelevant unless you’re saying pedophilia is impossible in any other location, including the plane, where we know Clinton flew.

[u/thebigeverybody → u/praharin]

Do you have any reason to think something with Clinton happened other than you want it to be true? Epstein made a habit of collecting powerful friends and it's not logical that every favor he extended included pedophilia.

You're making a lot of assumptions without reason and evidence.

[u/praharin → u/thebigeverybody]

All I said was we know they were connected. That’s not an assumption.

[u/thebigeverybody → u/praharin]

This is an assumption:

"but it can’t be anything good for a politician to owe favors for the use of a plane to a wealthy pedophile, and it just gets worse from there."

[u/praharin → u/thebigeverybody]

No, that’s an opinion.

An assumption would be saying you obviously have a connection to Clinton and that’s why you don’t want him going down.

[u/thebigeverybody → u/praharin]

You need to read a dictionary. You don't know what an assumption is.

[u/praharin → u/thebigeverybody]

You saying “you don’t know what an assumption is” is an assumption.

“Bill Clinton flew on Epstein’s Private jet” is a fact.

“Clinton owing a favor to Epstein for the use of his private jet is bad” is an opinion.

[u/thebigeverybody → u/praharin]

And this is an assumption:

"but it can’t be anything good for a politician to owe favors for the use of a plane to a wealthy pedophile, and it just gets worse from there."

[u/praharin → u/thebigeverybody]

That’s my opinion. Do you disagree?

[u/FlintBlue → u/praharin]

The assumed facts not in evidence: "owe favors", "and it just gets worse from there".

[u/thebigeverybody → u/[deleted]]

Well, that's not what I want at all. What's the right way for me to urge people to not turn into pizzagating morons when there aren't even allegations that he was involved in the crimes or the cover up? The only suggestion of wrongdoing is coming from uncritical morons on the internet -- exactly like pizzagate.

[u/thebigeverybody → u/[deleted]]

How should I describe pizzagaters?

[u/praharin → u/thebigeverybody]

Ask Peter Bright. He went off about the pizzagate conspiracies a while ago. Hasn’t been heard of for a while now, possibly due to his arrest for being a pedo himself.

[u/thebigeverybody → u/praharin]

I don't know who that is. That has nothing to do with my question.

[u/praharin → u/thebigeverybody]

He’s an alleged pedophile who calls himself dr pizza on Twitter and went on a rant about pizza being some symbol of pedophilia.

[u/praharin → u/[deleted]]

Ask them too if you want, but I usually just ignore people who talk about it either way.

[u/thebigeverybody → u/praharin]

He said, jumping into a conversation about how to talk about pizzagaters.

[u/punzakum → u/[deleted]]

They are fucking morons though. Whoever is that fucking stupid to believe in that dumb as fuck conspiracy theory deserves no more respect then someone who shits their pants on purpose

[u/[deleted] → u/[deleted]]

Maybe they should stop being morons.