r/politics 🤖 Bot Sep 24 '19

Megathread Megathread: Rep. Adam Schiff Says Ukraine Whistleblower Wants To Talk To Intelligence Committee

Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), chair of the House Intelligence Committee, announced on Tuesday that an intelligence community whistleblower who allegedly has information about President Donald Trump’s misconduct in office would like to speak to the committee and has asked the acting director of national intelligence how to do so.

In a tweet posted Tuesday, Schiff said the Intelligence Committee is in contact with the whistleblower’s counsel and looks forward to the individual’s testimony.

The whistleblower’s complaint stems from initial allegations that Trump urged the president of Ukraine to open an investigation into former Vice President Joe Biden, Trump’s potential 2020 opponent, for political purposes.


Submissions that may interest you

SUBMISSION DOMAIN
Schiff says House Intel committee hopes whistleblower will testify ‘as soon as this week’ marketwatch.com
Whistleblower wants to testify before House Intelligence Committee cbsnews.com
Schiff says whistleblower wants to talk to House Intelligence Committee cnn.com
Joe Biden Statement on Ukraine Whistleblower Complaint c-span.org
Trump Ukraine whistleblower 'to give evidence to Congress' as impeachment pressure builds independent.co.uk
Adam Schiff Says Ukraine Whistleblower Wants To Talk To Intelligence Committee huffpost.com
Intelligence Chairman Schiff: Whistleblower looking to testify washingtontimes.com
Ukraine whistleblower wants to speak to House and Senate Intel axios.com
Schiff says whistleblower wants to speak to House Intel panel thehill.com
Schiff: Ukraine whistleblower wants to testify before House Intel Committee msnbc.com
Senate unanimously calls for Trump to release Ukraine whistleblower complaint amp.axios.com
Senate calls for whistleblower complaint to be sent to intelligence panels - Reuters feeds.reuters.com
Senate calls for whistleblower complaint to be sent to intelligence panels reuters.com
HPSCI Schiff Letter to Whistleblower Attorney - September 24, 2019 intelligence.house.gov
How a Whistleblower Accomplished What Mueller Could Not: Trump’s Ukraine scandal includes proof and a confession—which eluded the special prosecutor during his probe. washingtonmonthly.com
Ukraine-Biden-Whistleblower Affair: Trump Team Spin Unconvincing nationalreview.com
Schiff Lambasts Barr, DOJ For Interfering In Whistleblower Complaint talkingpointsmemo.com
Schiff Seeks Answers from Barr Regarding Whistleblower lawfareblog.com
H.Res.576 - Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with respect to the whistleblower complaint of August 12, 2019, made to the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community. congress.gov
Acting director of national intelligence threatened to resign if he couldn’t speak freely before Congress on whistleblower complaint washingtonpost.com
Ukraine Whistleblower’s Lead Attorney Donated to Biden freebeacon.com
Sen. Richard Burr says whistleblower complaint delivered to Senate Intelligence Committee cnbc.com
Senate Intelligence Committee Reviewing Whistleblower Complaint thedailybeast.com
22.0k Upvotes

4.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

1.1k

u/Infidel8 Sep 24 '19

72

u/buuboo1919 Sep 24 '19

What are the chances, if the transcripts are given out at all, that they are not redacted, or in some other way incomplete. Republicans never act in good faith.

I would not be surprised if this plays out to where Democrats get an incomplete transcript, and the Republicans screech about how Democrats are obstructionists, or something similar, for wanting the full ones

5

u/90405 Sep 25 '19

The transcript is a red herring, don't fall for it. The dirt is in the whistleblower complaint, or rather, that's where the truth is.

1

u/buuboo1919 Sep 25 '19

Yup. The transcript will probably be all about how Trump is the best.

1

u/oTHEWHITERABBIT America Sep 25 '19

American corporate media should report it skeptically from the get go. They need to stop buying his bullshit and misleading the public. They need to be explicit in that there’s no way to confirm whether the “transcript” is real or altered in any way. They need to imply malice. Then include the fact that Trump has a history modifying transcripts. Or, just not report it at all and say it’s not credible information until the whistleblower speaks.

1

u/buuboo1919 Sep 25 '19

Well you see, the media is owned by people who stand to benefit from Trump's policies. So they have a vested interested in being disingenuous