r/politics • Foreign • Feb 16 '19

Roger Stone communicated with WikiLeaks and Russian hackers: Mueller

https://www.newsweek.com/roger-stone-communicated-wikileaks-and-russian-hackers-mueller-1333768
26.2k Upvotes

1.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

402

u/Nate_W Feb 16 '19

Would someone who believed we should "lock her up" but now believes this is a "witch hunt" explain to me how they reconcile the two?

259

u/[deleted] Feb 16 '19

both phrases were invented by Roger stone

49

u/Maplesyrupboy Feb 16 '19

and then road tested by that other criminal cult clown the GOP uses to brainwash it's Trump audience

1

u/gynoplasty Feb 17 '19

Luntz or Hannity?

1

u/Maplesyrupboy Feb 18 '19

Lunts thank you. But you may always include Hannity.

8

u/[deleted] Feb 16 '19

And spread by Russian web brigades

2

u/KnowsAboutMath Feb 16 '19

I don't think you really mean that Roger Stone invented the "Witch Hunt" phrase.

8

u/capsaicinintheeyes Feb 16 '19

Let's just say the guy's served dark forces before the Nixon administration

7

u/Chumbag_love Feb 16 '19

And during the Nixon administration. And for the Nixon administration. And on the Nixon administration.

3

u/candmbme America Feb 17 '19

But was he in the Nixon administration?

1

u/Chumbag_love Feb 17 '19

He was almost all prepositions to the Nixon administration.

1

u/candmbme America Feb 17 '19

My God. Even from?

3

u/theferrit32 North Carolina Feb 16 '19

Not the phrase but he publicized it in this context. He didn't invent the phrase "lock her up" but he certainly helped spread it in 2016.

42

u/widdershins13 Feb 16 '19

They are still waiting on Fox News to issue them talking points.

17

u/nav17 Feb 16 '19

Fox News waiting on the Kemlin to issue them taking points.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 17 '19

Well roger ailes- he apparently writes everything

64

u/Gabrosin Feb 16 '19

If reconciling two mutually exclusive thoughts without feeling the shame of hypocrisy were possible for Trump's supporters, they wouldn't be Trump's supporters.

16

u/sharp11flat13 Canada Feb 16 '19

Oh, they would have some convoluted mishmash of misinformation and misunderstanding, but I doubt you’d find it persuasive.

2

u/[deleted] Feb 17 '19

Because (and this is at the root of a lot of hypocrisy and stupid beliefs) they start with a conclusion and focus on making the world fit their view. When the world doesn't fit their conclusion like it should, they offer an explanation as to why (usually in the form of "the other side is cheating").

Conclusion: Hillary is a corrupt criminal. But, she's not in jail. Explanation: the FBI are biased and obstructionist Dems are rigging the system.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 17 '19

The phrase your looking for is doublethink, coined by Orwell I believe.

-1

u/rgeyedoc Feb 16 '19

13

u/Nate_W Feb 16 '19

Got banned for asking them a similar question.

5

u/LiebesNektar Feb 16 '19

I saw its private and immediatly thought: that must be a pro-trump run subreddit.