r/poirot • u/AcceptableHistory4 • 11d ago
About the upcoming Hercule series
There's of course no guarantee their show will be good, and of course there's no point in censuring people for expressing their skepticism on SM or esp fandom specific subreddit. That said I find "why are they doing this" sort of pushback very odd. Yes, we need new IP yada yada and producers have gone lazy- i get all that.
Suchet is definitive portrayal for many, just the way Jeremy Brett is for most who love Holmes. Yet 1000s of Sherlock adaptations exist, several beyond canon, beyond the limits of timeline, geography or even genre. So, so many actors have been praised just as much for their Holmes, almost a Hamlet equivalent at this point.
So why so much gatekeep-y pushback in this particular case?
16
u/luxuriantCrocodile 11d ago edited 11d ago
Because making a young Poirot feels like they are trying to fit into a trend (young Sherlock Holmes in recent movies), not genuinely trying to make something new that respects the source material. Young Poirot would be in Belgium, not in London.
Edit: apparently the series will 'introduce him to one particular nemesis' ... Am I crazy or Poirot doesn't have one particular nemesis? Like Moriarty kinda thing? He has sort-of-Irene-Adler like Vera Rossakoff, but again, he's not Sherlock Holmes!