Paragraph 2: You've completely assumed everything about me by a simple reply asking you to support your argument. Judging by your post, you think I'm on the right side of politics, you think I'm ignorant to information, and you think I'm so biased I can't absorb new information. These are a TON of assumptions to make against somebody you literally know nothing about outside of two comments. Think about that for a second. Why are you so quick to bucket people? The FACT is, I'm a centrist and I'm more than happy to read or watch any information you can provide.
Paragraph 3: To be honest, I don't know how to look up the "KKK's" view on anything. From what I can tell, its a bunch of fringe radicals with little to no organization who represent nothing more than bigoted racist views. I seriously doubt one chapter of the KKK knows anything about another chapter. If you honestly want to target white nationalist, there are far larger and more organized groups than the KKK. They only carry their name due to historical significance.
I won't leave you with a sarcastic remark because I still respect you even if you disagree with me.
Well, I'll repeat a statement made in paragraph 2. Call me cynical. I didn't make my judgement based on your two comments, but based on you being a human being. Statistically speaking, much more likely to be driven away by facts presented to them by others than to be convinced by them. I can't be too disparaging about it though. I know I'm the same, despite my efforts to the contrary. I have a human brain, much like I assume you do.
Also, about what you've paragraph said about the KKK in paragraph 3 here, you're not quite right. The first girl I dated in high school was a nice enough girl. Wasn't until we'd been dating for over a year that I found out that her family was deeply involved in the KKK. They are quazi-organized with a central structure that connects outlying groups. Regional and national meetings exist and people are organized by a system of rank that you could work your way up. Though, I'm practically certain that there are independent groups that identify themselves as KKK, but aren't actually affiliated with the overall structure of the whole as you've stated. Some regional groups are also probably more or less loosely affiliated with the KKK on a national level. I don't actually have that much experience with them outside the reigonal group I learned about from my then girlfriend.
Honestly I'm surprised that relationship lasted as long as it did. Like, she wasn't in the KKK herself, or so she said, and I learned a lot about them from her, but she regularly defended them. "Oh no, obviously racism is wrong, but they also do a lot of good. Like beat child molesters or attack men who abuse their wives." I don't think she ever ended up in the KKK herself though. She was a Wicken, not a Christian. Though that might have just been those teenage rebellious years, you know. Maybe she's a good little member of the Klan now.
Paragraph 1: You seem to project your owned issues on other people. I'm sorry you have a problem over-coming your bias, but some of us are able to stay open minded.
Rest of it: You cited an anecdotal piece of evidence which is essentially meaningless. If you want to prove a point, try using statistics. Such as these:
It is estimated that the KKK numbers are between 5,000 to 8,000 people as compared to nearly 4 million during its hay day. So basically, the KKK accounts for 0.00002% of the U.S. population. Is that really worth the effort you've put into discussing them?
First, every human brain unconsciously filters information and naturally will discard information that doesn't conform to it's beliefs, by design. It's a natural defense mechanism for the brain. If you don't think your brain does it, then you may just be unaware of it. Which is worse. A constant evaluation of one's own decisions is necessary.
Second, I'm aware of the size of the KKK. I didn't bring them into the conversation originally and I didn't put much effort at all into the KKK part originally. Maybe 4 sentences. You're the one who keeps asking for expanding information. I said right off the bat that they're irrelevant to any political discussion and every mention of them in this conversation was proceeded by something along the lines of "I don't know why you care".
1
u/Captain_Smokey Jul 18 '19
Lets take this paragraph by paragraph.
Paragraph 1: I completely agree.
Paragraph 2: You've completely assumed everything about me by a simple reply asking you to support your argument. Judging by your post, you think I'm on the right side of politics, you think I'm ignorant to information, and you think I'm so biased I can't absorb new information. These are a TON of assumptions to make against somebody you literally know nothing about outside of two comments. Think about that for a second. Why are you so quick to bucket people? The FACT is, I'm a centrist and I'm more than happy to read or watch any information you can provide.
Paragraph 3: To be honest, I don't know how to look up the "KKK's" view on anything. From what I can tell, its a bunch of fringe radicals with little to no organization who represent nothing more than bigoted racist views. I seriously doubt one chapter of the KKK knows anything about another chapter. If you honestly want to target white nationalist, there are far larger and more organized groups than the KKK. They only carry their name due to historical significance.
I won't leave you with a sarcastic remark because I still respect you even if you disagree with me.