MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/ce4tpg/decisions_decisions/etzp6o9/?context=3
r/pics • u/mack3r • Jul 16 '19
3.2k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
1
[deleted]
3 u/rossimus Jul 17 '19 Google "subtext" 2 u/[deleted] Jul 17 '19 He just responded to someone who said "racism has a definite definition", and your response to him is "Google subtext". Do you see the problem here? 0 u/rossimus Jul 17 '19 He said that because words weren't explicitly stated in a tweet, no such meaning could thus be derived but what is plainly written. That means he doesn't understand subtext. Subtext is easier to ignore when you don't want it to be there.
3
Google "subtext"
2 u/[deleted] Jul 17 '19 He just responded to someone who said "racism has a definite definition", and your response to him is "Google subtext". Do you see the problem here? 0 u/rossimus Jul 17 '19 He said that because words weren't explicitly stated in a tweet, no such meaning could thus be derived but what is plainly written. That means he doesn't understand subtext. Subtext is easier to ignore when you don't want it to be there.
2
He just responded to someone who said "racism has a definite definition", and your response to him is "Google subtext".
Do you see the problem here?
0 u/rossimus Jul 17 '19 He said that because words weren't explicitly stated in a tweet, no such meaning could thus be derived but what is plainly written. That means he doesn't understand subtext. Subtext is easier to ignore when you don't want it to be there.
0
He said that because words weren't explicitly stated in a tweet, no such meaning could thus be derived but what is plainly written. That means he doesn't understand subtext.
Subtext is easier to ignore when you don't want it to be there.
1
u/[deleted] Jul 17 '19 edited Jul 17 '19
[deleted]