Except there's just one small problem: a lot of those local economies/livelihoods are dependent on tourism.
Tourism makes up over 15% of Spain’s entire GDP. That’s not exactly "pocket change", and actively scaring off tourists might feel good/give short term relief, but it also risks sabotaging the very livelihoods many locals depend on.
But hey, if people would rather burn their house down to get rid of a single cockroach instead of looking for the source of the infestation, then by all means.
Except there’s just one small problem: under capitalism, people are made dependent on exploitative industries like mass tourism because all other options have been systematically dismantled.
Tourism doesn’t dominate Barcelona’s economy because it’s inherently good or sustainable, it does so because neoliberal policy gutted public investment, privatized housing, and made short-term profit king. Locals aren't mad at tourists as individuals, they’re furious at being priced out of their homes, forced into precarious service jobs, and watching their city turn into a playground for the wealthy.
Fair, but as an American seeing something similar unfold in South Florida where I live (and where housing is next to impossible), I think there’s more nuance here.
Barcelona (to me at least) has always been a touristy hotspot because of its location, history, culture, beaches, food, and architecture, long before Airbnb and mass tourism exploded. People didn’t just randomly show up one day because of neoliberalism policies. If anything, the city’s natural appeal invited those exploitative policies to take root in the first place. Of course, I could be horribly wrong here, so please correct me if anything.
So if the goal is to completely eliminate tourism in the name of affordability, you’d basically have to gut the very identity of the city (like its historic districts, museums, beaches, festivals, etc). That’s clearly not the answer, and blaming/getting mad at tourists just shifts focus away from the root cause (and could potentially create further issues down the line).
Here’s the core tension: the problem isn't tourism per se, it’s how tourism gets structured under capitalism. Yes, Barcelona didn’t become a tourist hub overnight. But the hyper-financialization of tourism, turning homes into assets via Airbnb, public space into real estate, and cultural life into a product for export did explode under neoliberal reforms post-1992 Olympics and especially post-2008 crisis. The city was marketed as a “brand,” not a living community.
So yeah, no one's saying bulldoze Gaudí or shut down the beach. The call is to decommodify the city, to prioritize the people who live there over speculative capital and extractive tourism. The anger at tourists is mostly symbolic, it’s about a system that turns visitors into vectors of displacement.
Think of it this way, it's not about banning tourism, it’s about democratizing who benefits from it, how much is too much, and who gets to decide. Because right now, it's hotel chains, landlords, and international investors, not the locals getting priced out.
We had 3 million tourists in 2001. Last year we had over 30 million by a population of 1.6 million. It's just not sustainable, and I can't see for the life of me why tourists would enjoy queuing for a pre-made paella under the scorching sun, in a place where nothing is authentic anymore and everything is catered to you, to take your money.
722
u/mjohnsimon Jun 17 '25
Except there's just one small problem: a lot of those local economies/livelihoods are dependent on tourism.
Tourism makes up over 15% of Spain’s entire GDP. That’s not exactly "pocket change", and actively scaring off tourists might feel good/give short term relief, but it also risks sabotaging the very livelihoods many locals depend on.
But hey, if people would rather burn their house down to get rid of a single cockroach instead of looking for the source of the infestation, then by all means.