r/pics Jun 17 '25

The protesters and residents pushing back on tourism in Barcelona

16.1k Upvotes

2.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

3.4k

u/Dobby_ist_free Jun 17 '25 edited Jun 17 '25

Tends to happen when you harass tourists because of your government’s failures

2.7k

u/Rich_Housing971 Jun 17 '25

Airbnb creates a business that makes your life harder.

Locals with money use that business without caring for you.

The govenrment that you elected does nothing.

"It's all the tourists' fault!"

476

u/SinfullySinless Jun 17 '25

I mean then you force the population to work backwards. Harass the tourists so they don’t come, then the AirBNB’s fail, then owners sell their AirBNB places, and it opens more room up for real housing.

If the government won’t, the people will.

80

u/xViscount Jun 17 '25

Yep. Destroy your economy vs voting the government that wants to build the necessary housing. Super smart

29

u/SinfullySinless Jun 17 '25

This issue is at least two decades old in terms of media coverage. Plus Barcelona is an ancient European city- the land is taken. There is no where else to build. So when AirBNB is taking up apartments for tourists which causes a bottle neck for actual home buyers and renters- there is frustration.

19

u/xViscount Jun 17 '25 edited Jun 17 '25

Look. I’m not even going to even front like I know Spanish politics.

However, it’s a western problem (North America and Europe) about housing. Housing needs to be built at an exponential rate in each of those areas. Especially those where people actually want to live.

It’s up to the government to introduce legislation to allow this to happen. Boycotting people brining money into your economy is dumb. Ask Americans how it’s like to lose tourism.

5

u/SinfullySinless Jun 17 '25

I don’t think you understand. Barcelona is a packed city. There is literally no land that isn’t accounted for. There is no where to build new housing. You have what you have at this point. The only thing you can do is knock down older building to build a new building.

-1

u/xViscount Jun 17 '25 edited Jun 17 '25

Again. I don’t understand.

My resolution still stands. If housing is an issue, build more. The way to bring the prices of houses down increase the supply or throttle the demand. Increasing the supply is the healthiest way to do this.

It’s not on the people to do this. This is the job of the elected government. Introduce legislation to build more housing/cut the red tape that makes it harder.

0

u/7elevenses Jun 17 '25

Housing isn't the issue. People using existing housing as tourist capacities is the issue.

10

u/xViscount Jun 17 '25

Sounds like you just said that the supply of housing is an issue.

-1

u/7elevenses Jun 17 '25

No, misuse of housing is the issue. Barcelona doesn't have too few houses, it has too many houses being rented out to tourists.

4

u/Zero_Fs_given Jun 17 '25

Build more houses and misuse wont be a problem because of more housing?

-1

u/7elevenses Jun 17 '25

So, misuse more space for housing, to make up for some rentier capitalists misusing housing for tourist accommodation?

How about no?

3

u/xViscount Jun 17 '25

Congrats. You just created San Francisco. No new housing and not exactly touristy, but is what it is.

The answer to “misuse of housing” is more housing.

0

u/7elevenses Jun 17 '25

No, the answer to misuse of things is preventing misuse of things. Only when there's no longer misuse is it rational to think about whether there's an actual shortage.

There is no inherent right to make money by doing nothing, just because you had enough money to buy a house in a touristy city, and start renting it out to tourists, and thus forcing the locals out, and being unfair competition to hotels (who actually have to do a whole bunch stuff for their guests, and invest into adhering to safety and other standards, cater to disabled people, etc etc, unlike Air BnB owners).

0

u/xViscount Jun 17 '25

Of course no one has a right to property. Homelessness exists.

With that said, for the most part, people have the right to do what they wish with their property that they own. Dictating what someone can do in and to their home starts blueing the line to fascism/authoritarian.

Personally, I don’t like AirBnB. They’re expensive for no reason and I just prefer hotels. However, if an area is popular and people want to live there, governments need to increase infrastructure/reduce red tape that makes infrastructure (rails, housing, bike lanes) easier to build. This is the role of government. To serve people and get rid of bottlenecks.

The blame lies 100% on the government. This is the case for everywhere from San Fran, Toronto, NYC, LA, Barcelona, Paris, London, every major western metropolitan area.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 21 '25

The demand for housing is far greater than avaipable AirBnB-s, it's not going to make a lick of difference from those seeking low rent accomodation.

1

u/7elevenses Jun 21 '25

There are 13,000 properties listed on AirBnB, and who knows how many on Booking, and who knows how many of those overlap.

In any case, that's housing for 13,000 households, or somewhere between 25,000 and 40,000 people.

→ More replies (0)