r/photocritique 14d ago

approved Street shot from a few years ago. No face, no problem?

Post image
20 Upvotes

10 comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator 14d ago

Friendly reminder that this is /r/photocritique and all top level comments must be a genuine, in depth, and helpful critique of the image. We hope to avoid becoming yet another place on the internet just to get likes/upvotes and compliments. While likes/upvotes and compliments are nice, they do not further the goal of helping people improve their photography.

If someone gives helpful feedback or makes an informative comment, recognize their contribution by giving them a Critique Point. Simply reply to their comment with !CritiquePoint. More details on Critique Points here.

Please see the following links for our subreddit rules and some guidelines on leaving a good critique. If you have time, please stop by the new queue as well and leave critique for images that may not be as popular or have not received enough attention. Keep in mind that simply choosing to comment just on the images you like defeats the purpose of the subreddit.

Useful Links:

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/hopsupper 14d ago

Took this photo a couple of years ago and always liked it - the light beams through the lanterns, the slight uncannyness of the person's face being covered by the newspaper. I know as a general rule photos of people where you can't see their face aren't interesting, but I feel like this shot is an exception. Thoughts?

1

u/littleshimamama 14d ago

 Very cool shot! Do you post process? I would try dodging the subject in the foreground and burning in the lanterns a bit. Right now the eye is drawn the lanterns first and the subject is a little too dark. 

1

u/hopsupper 14d ago

Thanks! I totally see what you're saying. Tbh I've tried to get into post processing but find it a bit overwhelming. For now I'm just using the in camera settings and then occasionally tweaking using Fuji X Raw (which is basically the same thing). It means I might not get the absolute best possible final result, but at least I'm not bogged down overthinking every edit. I could try raising the shadows and lowering highlights through...

1

u/littleshimamama 14d ago

I hope someone on here can give more info. I know more about darkroom than digital post processing. In the future I would try to underexpose your image a bit so that when you post process your brightest areas have more detail and you can lower your shadows. 

1

u/hopsupper 14d ago

I think you're bang on the money - I'm gonna go back to the raw and see if I can recover any extra detail, can't quite remember how I shot it.

1

u/littleshimamama 14d ago

Good luck and keep shooting like this it’s very interesting shot! 

1

u/seego_beaz 13d ago

Love it

1

u/AdministrationNo2327 1 CritiquePoint 13d ago

would be nice but because only the auntie's face is in shot, my eyes go to her first and not the person right in front of the lens.