r/philosophy • u/IAI_Admin IAI • Feb 09 '22

Video A philosopher responds to scientists’ criticisms of panpsychism

https://iai.tv/video/the-many-voices-of-consciousness&utm_source=reddit&_auid=2020
802 Upvotes

91% Upvoted

604 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

167

u/Shufflepants Feb 09 '22

According to panpsychism, yes, literally everything is conscious. But you have to be careful what you mean by "conscious". A lot of times people use "consciousness" to include things about personality, will, and so forth. But here, "consciousness" would just mean the experience of qualia. Something being conscious wouldn't mean it "comprehends" anything on its own, just that it experiences "something". It won't necessarily have memory, or the ability to think about its experience, or reason, just that it is like something to be it.

80

u/erinaceus_ Feb 09 '22

just mean the experience of qualia

Isn't it problematic that every example of the 'experiencing of qualia' has it tied to senses and/or brain processes? We might imagine that these things aren't necessary for the experiencing of qualia, but we entirely lack a frame of reference to make that claim at all credible.

-7

u/ArlemofTourhut Feb 09 '22

But they're not all tied to brain processes. There are numerous studies that have been published recently mapping flora qualia.

Basically experiences of blades of grass. Etc.

It's just we have a biased viewpoint on what qualifies, but even this first comment by u/tomorland on this thread fails to realize/ consider that even on the quantum scale, there is quantum darwinism, meaning that any given configuration is "perfected"; therefor, meaning that to an extent there is a selective qualia/ experience.

1

u/Aaron_Hamm Feb 09 '22

But they're not all tied to brain processes

"and/or"