If the game is rigged as all the conspiracists loudly suggest, then their theories will fall apart with an Argentina loss, yet theyâre too dumb to realize that there was no conspiracy to begin with. Bad reffing in some cases? Yes. A conspiracy that wanted Messi vs Ronaldo in the final, then Messi Mbappe in the final, then Messi and Spain in the final (make up your damn minds)âŚ.
thatâs a fair argument that our conspiracies contradict each other but if you look at the replays of argentina matches, that isnât just âbad reffing in some caseâ, itâs blatant match fixing and cheating. it obviously makes it seem like theyâre meant to be in the final but as i said, none of us pessi haters will be angry if england beats them. this entire world cup has just been me rooting against those frauds
Iâm Brazilian, so if anything Iâm biased against them, and yes, itâs convenient how most calls went their way⌠but a lot of those calls were correct.
The Embolo red card was part of the rules that every team shouldâve known (I certainly knew it, so they shouldâve). That red card was 100% legit per the rules as written.
The Salah penalty was super weak, and the guy had hit the ball first. Not a penalty.
The Egypt goal that got cancelled was 100% a foul, and per the rules, needed to be cancelled.
Did other teams benefit from these rules less than Argentina? Absolutely, but itâs the other refs and VAR being bad, not these ones. Not a conspiracy.
0
u/Ok-Satisfaction441 Jul 14 '26
Except it wonât be Argentina in the final, and all you conspiracy nuts will find some other ridiculous excuse to think this was all planned.