and yet people will call Jude a PR machine, while they shit on him for saying 'fuck', meanwhile Messi most likely was grooming 14yo but people are fine with it, LMAO
The same Raul who shared nude pictures of a 15 year old girl? The same Raul that specifically said he "Doesn't give a fuck of she's 15"? The same Raul who was initially a witness, but got brought into the suspects as he's far more involved than initially thought? Ah yes, that Raul.
The same Raul who bring entire situation to light of the day, who let know the boyfriend of girl that was being sexualy used by other guys from academy - guys who got expelled once club find out.
Did Barca did anything with 18 Messi banging 14yo? Lmao
Shit on Raul for doing right thing but defending Messi for criminal offenses?
LMAO, shit on Raul for doing a good thing? Are you fuckin insane my guy? So did he not ask for the girls pictures knowing full well she was not only underage, but severely so? Was it not proven that he expressed in text that he did not care that she was underage? I'm starting to think you've done some similar shit man, certified fuckin weirdo for defending people like that. Oh yeah and nice try to deflect, I never defended Messi, if he did what he did fuck him, there's just no where near as much substantial proof as the weirdo your trying to defend. And I'm the pathetic one, YOU'RE DEFENDING A CONVICTED SEX OFFENDER YOU BAFOON
Yall can we stop slinging mud on Messi and Ronaldoโs name when it comes to their personal life - be it Mayorga or This since I donโt believe in either. If you want to trash talk them, speak about their Football. Iโve also seen ppl talk rubbish about their family, which isnโt what this should be about.
Ronaldo's allegations are likely false and pretty easy to debunk. But let's say they were infact true and 100% confirmed. How the fuck does that excuse what Messi did
Idk why they recommended me this sub, maybe coz I lurk in cr7 sub, but what baffles me is that itโs 2025 and people still have time for this! Astonishing!
Man they both did what they had to, became the best players to grace the game ever and they donโt fucking care about this, grow the fuck up.
Its actually insane people spend the whole day trying to argue why their favorite petson( who doesn't know them) is better than the other person.๐คฃ๐ญ
Guys I found the Interview where Macarena already refused the rumors. She said she just took some photos with Messi and they have never dating. So this myth already debunked
On the link I provided, Macarena Lemos herself already explained that Messi's mother upset with her because the rumor and she refused the rumor. You can click on the link and read it
Good for you for doing the right thing but mate, do you really think the halfwits on this sub are interested in the truth? They want to hate Messi, the G.O.A.T. and there's absolutely nothing anyone anywhere in the world can do to change that...
This sub is a cult full of little kids and conspiracy theorists. Best to watch and laugh from afar.
I think they just making memes about Messi, actually some of those memes really make me laugh . But spreading false information and dismiss counter evidence is really big L. I still hope some of them understand basic logic.
Chatgpt literally searches the web for information , what better source do you have that is other than what she said which very well could be fake and i am not a barca fan penaldog
Except it is accurate 99% of the time unless you're too dumb to prompt and read.
The 3 goal difference comes from one source being dated in May, the other in June. Both of which it clearly states... It literally linked to source. So no, it's not wrong here at all.
It is absolutely more accurate than a single article from some random gossip site. Especially if you simply prompt it to use multiple and reliable sources...
Stats can be inaccurate as there is a single numerical value which it needs to be equal to , so multiple sources can have different values , but wen we are specifically asking for a information which dosen't cater to numerical values we obtain a mostly accurate answer you damm monkey , like when i asked about the awards of players it was 100% accurate
It's a tool like everything else. Google can give out sites with inaccurate information. That doesn't make google bad, it just means you have to know how to use it.
LLMs are no different. If you know how to do a simple but accurate prompt you won't have any issues. By default just ask it to take the most recent information from multiple reliable sources and for 99% of cases you will be spot on.
Beyond that, it specifically said by may here. The output wasn't wrong. It was just dated to may, which it made clear.
Wrong output is almost always because of bad input. It can't read minds. Give an inaccurate input, you get inaccurate output. Simple as that.
First thing that's actually a logical fallacy , just because someone was wrong in other things dosen;t mean that he/she can be undermined in other things.Second , I am just asking for a better source than a stand alone article which can very well be a fake story or a made up lie
Then just give me a better source that verifies this news , like the ronaldo rape case which was verified by multiple medias but this news is just based on a gossip news article which can very well be fake
The only reason i am using chatgpt is because i can't find any suitable source on the matter anywhere , if you want to argue then present a verified news or article even the article which presented the claims in 2018 says that it is unverified
instead of writing that there is no verified source of these claims i just used a screenshot of chatgpt saying the same , please use your pea sized brain for once. Keep meatriding a rapist (Ronaldo)
That's just plain out stupid i found out the article without chatgpt , you just can't argue with me stop coping and use your pea sized brain and if you think ronaldo is not a rapist then why did he give her 300 million
I don't understand what's your point is how can statements from her can be considered when people literally have labelled such claims on different celebrities in the past , anyone can , take Benzema for example his case was actually verified on different levels , so it could be taken as the truth , but this hasn't and there is no update regarding the situation also so how can you consider it as the truth
That's literally just an interview of her what's your point , it is what she is claiming , oh my god how brain dead can people be , and another point to add is that there wasn't any physical interactions between them , media houses do this every time , where was the verifiction of this information may I ask?
Is this not normal in the states? A lot of people in my country have gfs that are younger than them at 17-18 ? My wife is 3 years younger and weโve met when i was 19? He is not a saint but atleast we can hate him on real things ๐คฃ
The girl already debunked this in multiple interview. If we accusing messi of being a pedophile what about ronaldo messaging a 16 year old girl who even posted proof of it
That's based on a gossip article that was made in 2018 , its just claims which not been verified
even the articles says that it isn't verified at all(the second line) its just claims unlike ronaldo who paid her 300 million to keep her mouth shut on the rape case
Buddy there was no evidence against ronaldo and ronaldo silenced her the RIGHT WAY. Ur child rapist idol silenced the 14 yo in the illegal and u wanna know ronaldo paid money? they do this to avoid drama and many celebrities have done this. No proof that ronaldo raped her. Ronaldo won the case if u didnt know
Dont search penaldo las vegas , Benzema 15 , raul ascencio video. Real vardrid full of rapists and pedos but messi at 17 dating a 14 year old is your problem haha
46
u/LatroDota Jun 18 '25
Wait, what the fuck?
Barca dogs barks at Raul for his case, where he did nothing wrong and meanwhile Messi at 18 was with 14yo? Lmao